Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 February 20

= February 20 =

05:50:54, 20 February 2015 review of submission by Bihngo
Why our Article has been declined ? Please help Bihngo (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, Bihngo. I removed your copy of the entire draft which you have pasted here and put a link to it instead. I was primarily declined because it contains a significant amount of text copied verbatim from http://www.kundansrivastava.com/about, http://www.kundansrivastava.com/book/, and other web pages. The reviewer's notice at the top of your draft says:
 * This submission appears to be taken from http://www.kundansrivastava.com/about, http://www.kundansrivastava.com/book/. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. We cannot accept copyrighted content taken from websites or printed sources. Note that copyright protection is granted to all works automatically, whether it is asserted or not. Unless stated otherwise, assume that most content on the internet is copyrighted and not suitable for publishing on Wikipedia. Copyrighted content can be cited as a reliable source if it meets Wikipedia's guidelines; however, your submission must be written in your own words, and in continuous prose.
 * Did you read the notice? Voceditenore (talk) 06:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Followup The draft itself has been blanked by the reviewer because it is a copyright violation. It will shortly be deleted. Please do not restore the blanked text. I have saved the references and file links and placed them on your talk page at User talk:Bihngo so that you can use them to write a new draft in your own words. You may not copy text from other web pages. Please read Copying text from other sources before you begin a draft. Voceditenore (talk) 06:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

14:29:03, 20 February 2015 review of submission by Mmckeoneditor
My first article was just published, but is flagged with two issues (see below). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landry_%26_Kling

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
 * This article has no links to other Wikipedia articles. (February 2015)
 * This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (February 2015)

I addded several links to other articles, so can you remove that suggestion? Also, what do we do to remove "this article is an orphan", if there are not links to the company from other articles?

Thanks! Mmckeoneditor (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 15:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Now that the article has been approved, questions like this should probably be directed to the general WP:HELPDESK, but I'll help you out here. I removed the first "no links to other articles" tag, but the second tag will remain until enough other articles link to Landry & Kling (which you can see here). --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

14:35:49, 20 February 2015 review of submission by Sarah at GOPC
I am requesting assistance because I was told my article for creation was not accepted, therefore deleted, because it includes copyright information. I am the one and only member of the Global Obesity Prevention Center at Johns Hopkins with full permissions to all content and web copy for all digital media, therefore, all information in the article entry I am trying to submit is not copyright. I have full access to all of the GOPC's digital channels and all content that is published on the website http://www.globalobesity.org/ is written by me. What steps need to be taken in order for the GOPC at Johns Hopkins to have an entry on Wikipedia? If easier, please feel free to email me directly at s*******@jhu.edu Sarah at GOPC (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 15:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia assumes that any text published on the web, unless it specifically states otherwise, is under copyright. If you would like to use text that you have already published elsewhere on the web, please see WP:Donating copyrighted material. However, even if the copyright issues are resolved, most text written on organization's webpages is not appropriate for Wikipedia, as it is often not written in the proper tone and is too promotional sounding. You are much better off trying to write things objectively in your own words.
 * Also, I wanted to point out that editing Wikipedia with a conflict of interest is strongly discouraged. If you plan to edit an article about your organization, and you feel that you can maintain a neutral point of view, I would highly recommend that you review the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide before proceeding. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

Request on 14:46:10, 20 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Shyamw1
Shyamw1 (talk) 14:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC) Hello,

I am new to editing and yesterday I added information to the article on N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar. The information was obtained from "The Hindu". I have researched the web and article databases in our library and have found additional information on N.G but I would like some guidance on how to go about adding this information without infringing copyright, please. I would love to add to this article - it is very personal to me because I am his great granddaughter and I have some biographical information that is accurate. Also, how should I cite information obtained from members of my family?

Thanks for any help you can provide me.

Winnie Shyam PAGE''' ]]) 15:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you rewrite the information in your own words, without directly copying and pasting from "The Hindu", there would be no copyright infringement. Just make sure to add a citation in the article to where you got the information from (see WP:REFBEGIN for help adding citations). --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

Request on 14:48:34, 20 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gaurabwiki
I have written the article with text and images freely available on the internet. I would be easier for me to edit the article if I get to know where I have violated copyright rules. Thanks you.

Gaurabwiki (talk) 14:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

PAGE''' ]]) 14:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * By "freely available", do you mean that the text and images were explicitly released under a compatible free license? If not, Wikipedia assumes that any text published on the web, unless it specifically states otherwise, is under copyright and therefore cannot be copied and pasted into articles. However, even if the copyright issues are resolved, most text found on the web is not appropriate for Wikipedia, as it is often not written in the proper tone and is too promotional sounding. You are much better off trying to write things objectively in your own words. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK


 * The text is mostly all copied from http://ycolympiad.com/details/, and there is no free use license posted that I can see. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)




 * Hello Gaurabwiki. Available on the internet doesn't mean "free". Your draft, Draft:Young Chef Olympiad, was copied verbatim from http://ycolympiad.com/details/. That page is clearly marked Copyright @2014-15 ycolympiad.com. All rights reserved. See the Duplication Detector Report (this report will work until the draft is deleted from Wikipedia). Please read Copying text from other sources from beginning to end before attempting to write another draft. Voceditenore (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

17:04:12, 20 February 2015 review of submission by PECPLC
Hi, Very much new to this, so please don't assume I know anything. I've submitted an article draft, but this has been rejected for copyright. Which I assume is because the article text is the same as in the reference given. The thing is that we are the copyright holders of the reference article. How do we give the appropriate copyright permission / waver to satisfy wikipedias requirements? Thanks in anticipation, PECPLC (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It wasn't a particularly well-written article and longer than it needed to be. Best thing is to do a complete re-write and provide references! &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Request on 20:02:13, 20 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Nkemdy
I want to know how and where i violated wikipedia's copyright violation on my article, please be specific, thanks.

Nkemdy (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 22:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You didn't violate Wikipedia's copyright. You violated the copyright of http://seriousprojectfilms.blogspot.com/2015/01/fim-village-no1-african-movies.html when you copied text from their website into your draft. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

20:55:54, 20 February 2015 review of submission by AndyP73
I was told that the article was too much of an advertisement, yet I followed the exact same format of companies very similar to ours including GoToMeeting and AnyMeeting and provided many references. If someone could point out which aspect of the article needs revision, I would be very grateful. I did spend a lot of time writing it. I would be more than willing to remove whatever doesn't seem neutral. Thank you for your time and any help

AndyP73 (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello Andy. The existence of other sub-standard articles in Wikipedia does not mean that we need more. One of the sources you reference in your Draft contains the text "With instant access and an elegant user interface that is remarkably easy to use, you can start being productive right away using our free web conferencing tools." A Draft supported by sources like this is not suitable to become a Wikipedia article. I would also suggest that the text in your Draft "It was born from the idea that web conferencing could help people anywhere learn and build relationships with peers and experts" is also unduly promotional. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 08:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

21:03:23, 20 February 2015 review of submission by MarthaAnsara
I would like to upgrade the AUSTRALIAN DIRECTORS GUILD article from B. I looked carefully at the grading criteria but cannot spot where the article falls down. A previous reviewer said that I was too close to the subject. But I have never been employed by or held a position in the Australian Directors Guild, although I have (of course) been a long time member (am a life member). When I realised there was no article on the ADG in Wikipedia, I thought it would be a good contribution to do one. I have written many articles for magazines on Australian Cinema and have published a book on the subject which has (incredible!) popped up in  Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shadowcatchers -- I hope that I am knowledgeable and objective. Australian film history is a sadly small field and there wouldn't be many others who would write this article on the ADG.

SO -- what I need to know is where specifically the article falls down. Can anyone detect a bias in it which I can't see. One problem I did find is that there is insufficient online material for the necessary references and I had to go back to newsletters and meetings minutes to find out certain things.

So any help would be greatly appreciated. MarthaAnsara (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC) Martha Ansara

PAGE''' ]]) 22:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Your article is currently at "B" status. The only upgrades from there are to "Good Article" and "Featured Article", both of which require an official review. You can review the good article criteria and, if you feel the article is ready, nominate it at Good article nominations. At a quick glance, you would need clean up your references, as many of them use bare URLs while others, such as "I was on some of these committees and they are referred to in archived newsletters and reports" are not verifiable. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

21:16:14, 20 February 2015 review of submission by Bbentllc
Bbentllc (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

We are really having a difficult time with what is notable and not understanding the requirements. There is so much notable press about Lizzie Sider, I am very confused about this being declined. Can you please, please help me to fix this issue and help me have some clarity.

Bbentllc (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Brenda Brown

PAGE''' ]]) 22:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Please review WP:MUSICBIO. Does Lizzie Sider meet any of these criteria? Can you provide significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article that verify that the criterion is met? --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

Yes, Lizzie has two songs that charted in the top 40 on the Music Row Charts in Nashville that are Nationally recognized. 2012“Butterfly"@40 2013“I Love You That Much @37 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicRow Do you need to see the actual charts from 2012 and 2013? In addition, her two singles had music videos that were in rotation on GAC TV and CMT TV both national broadcasted TV stations.  Thank you so much for your help. Bbentllc (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Brenda PAGE''' ]]) 03:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Music Row Charts doesn't really count as a national chart because they only focus on secondary markets. See WP:CHARTS for a list of which charts Wikipedia considers suitable, which in this case would be mainly Billboard and the genre-specific Billboard Top Country charts. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

This is really quite difficult. This young lady has been on several TV shows and, her two singles had music videos that were in rotation on GAC TV and CMT TV both national broadcasted TV stations. This should qualify her, yes? I have so much press also. She has been on Hallmark's Home & Family, Queen Latifah, etc.... I really need to get this page approved. Billboard has written about her Please advise. Thank you in advance for your time. Bbentllc (talk) 05:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)bbentllc