Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 January 10

= January 10 =

04:48:01, 10 January 2015 review of submission by Ajithdenesan
Ajithdenesan (talk) 04:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Ajithdenesan, what is your question? Your draft has nothing written on it so there's nothing for us to review, and your "question" here doesn't have any question for us, so there's nothing for us to answer. You need to more clearly explain what you're trying to do please. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

21:01:58, 10 January 2015 review of submission by Slainson
My draft was very quickly reviewed. I was asked to make changes, which I did very quickly. How long might it take for the re-review? I think I made sufficient changes for the draft to be accepted. Slainson (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The changes you made were good, but not enough. The draft is chock full of quotes, which have to go. The content should be in your own words. You have some good newspaper sources and I would write the content based on those. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

22:05:51, 10 January 2015 review of submission by Slainson
Thanks for the feedback. I made another round of significant changes. I took out all of the quotes. You were right; I had put them there to show credibility. I am happy just to use the citations without the quotes.

Slainson (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 22:14:46, 10 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by RAKGRS
I am a new editor and it is my first time wikipedia, I need wikipedia editors help to approve my content thanks

RAKGRS (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Two reviewers have already told you that Draft:RAKGRS is written like an advertisement. The messages posted on the draft page contain links to further information and guidance. What further assistance do you need? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)