Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 January 16

= January 16 =

07:54:44, 16 January 2015 request for review by Wajeehleo

Please Guide me Why my company Draft page rejected? I put all the reference under the information as much as I can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wajeehleo (talk • contribs) 07:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello Wajeehleo, the issue is that of your three footnotes, one is to iTunes (proves nothing except that this product exists, which was not in question, and violates rules on advertising by directing readers to iTunes) and then a PR release (which cannot be believed because the company writes it themselves). I strongly suggest you read our guideline WP:Reliable sources to see what sources would be accepted, and note that Arabic-language news would work fine as well. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

18:20:16, 16 January 2015 review of submission by Rizwan rizwan50
Rizwan rizwan50 (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Rizwan rizwan50, your draft page is blank, and you've written no question here to ask us. We cannot respond to someone posting literally nothing at all. What is your question? What are you intending to write about in your Draft? MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

18:22:28, 16 January 2015 review of submission by Kaymusicmayor
Unsourced birth information has been removed from the Adam Jensen Musician article page, but the unsourced birth information (birthday) is still showing up in search engine results like Google. How can I remove the unsourced information from appearing in search results? It appears to be completely removed from the article page as I don't see anyway to edit the article's meta data. Any guidance here would be extremely helpful. Thanks!Kaymusicmayor (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)Kaymusicmayor Kaymusicmayor (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Rizwan rizwan50 (talk) Hi, Please see my question above about removing unsourced wikipedia information from search results. I emailed Google to reindex the page, do you see any other issues with the article page that might be causing the unsourced "born" information to still be appearing? Or do you think the Google reindex will fix it? Thanks so much in advance! Kaymusicmayor (talk) 21:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Kaymusicmayor