Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 July 4

= July 4 =

15:32:32, 4 July 2015 review of submission by 66.38.52.23
I need to add a picture to the infobox on my draft but I'm not a member of Wikipedia and there are no photos of the subject of my draft on Wikimedia.

66.38.52.23 (talk) 15:32, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Who owns the copyright of the picture that you want to add? Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

15:56:31, 4 July 2015 review of submission by Walking High Point
Walking High Point (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC) Why doesn't Wikipedia show up when I do a Google search for John Harrison Finger?Walking High Point (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Walking High Point - Wikipedia has no influence at all on how or when Google do whatever they do. It can take several days for Google to index new Wikipedia articles, but it's really not our concern. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

18:50:38, 4 July 2015 review of submission by Mexico76
Draft:Teardrain

Mexico76 (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC) Hi. I was wondering why Allmusic.com and Discogs are considered nonvalid sources. I referred to several band pages from Wikipedia to create this page and they seem to be the standard sources. Other than sending in the physical materials (i.e., albums, pictures, magazine articles, radio concerts/plays, television show inclusions, etc.) how else can one prove the information is correct? I would also like to know what is the criteria for inclusion. Many bands are included with the same -- or even less -- type of information from these sources, and yet they remain on Wikipedia. Please advise. The submission was for a band called Teardrain. If it would be better to have Wikipedia create the page themselves, please let me know.


 * Discogs is not reliable because it is user-generated. Whether Allmusic is reliable or not is more nuanced. You can read past discussions about it here. If you were writing about the album Speak No Evil and needed a reference for the fact that all of the pieces on it were written by Wayne Shorter, either of the following citations would be fine:
 * Online sources are easier to verify, but offline liner notes, magazine articles, TV programs, and yes, even books, are perfectly acceptable. No need to send anything anywhere.
 * Online sources are easier to verify, but offline liner notes, magazine articles, TV programs, and yes, even books, are perfectly acceptable. No need to send anything anywhere.
 * Online sources are easier to verify, but offline liner notes, magazine articles, TV programs, and yes, even books, are perfectly acceptable. No need to send anything anywhere.


 * The inclusion criteria for musicians are complex. Be certain in your own mind which criterion or criteria a band satisfies, and make it clear in the article lead. Most bands do not warrent a stand alone encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality content and low quality content. The existence of articles that don't follow the guidelines is not an excuse to create more articles like that. See the essays Other stuff exists and Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions for further explanation. It's natural to learn by example, but be sure you're learning from excellent examples, like Wikipedia's featured articles about music. Worldbruce (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

19:03:03, 4 July 2015 review of submission by 70.41.81.241
Just wanted to suggest a article on Homer Skilton Powley, he was a genius in ballistics in the last century, he invented the Powley computer which should alos have a page, thank you for your time 70.41.81.241 (talk) 19:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have added Powley and his Computer to my personal to-do list. It may take me a few months, but I plan to write those articles later. Thanks for the suggestion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)