Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 June 20

= June 20 =

11:22:46, 20 June 2015 review of submission by Londonalley
Londonalley (talk) 11:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Your submission doesn't indicate any sources. Where does the material come from? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

19:02:10, 20 June 2015 review of submission by Lkirkpatrick89
I need to make this article more notable, but I don't know how. Please help! Lkirkpatrick89 (talk) 19:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

23:06:06, 20 June 2015 review of submission by DESiegel
This draft has been tagged as a copyvio, blanked and tagged for speedy deletion. I came to it on patrol of. It is in fact a copy of http://quaestorpress.com/author1.html. But that page is "licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. " I think i have read that a CC 4.0 license is incompatible with Wikipedia's CC 3.0 license, although i looked today and couldn't find anything expliocitly saying so. But the source page is licensed under a free license. Given that, i don't think blanking or speed deletion are appropriate. We can take a bit of time to deal with this, i think. This was tagged by and  and I hope they would join this thread. DES (talk) 23:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

DES (talk) 23:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Draft:Arturo D. Hernández (author) was speedily deleted. Since CC-BY only requires attribution, I don't think it has any special compatibility requirements to be re-used under a more restrictive license. I have asked the deleting admin to consider undeleting. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Resolved
 * An admin kindly restored Draft:Arturo D. Hernández (author). As the Creative Commons license was neither mentioned, nor the article attributed, anywhere in the draft, others were right to reject it. I have since added a brief license link and attribution at the bottom. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)