Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 March 3

= March 3 =

02:29:14, 3 March 2015 review of submission by 147.194.15.73
Hello, Sam

Here is a link that talks about his involvement in Rukh and its forerunner Prosvita, and the fact that he is the head editor of Zhuravlik : http://referatu.net.ua/referats/7569/175243/?page=1

Here is a link written on the occasion of his 75th birthday that talks about his scientific and academic achievements: http://www-nuclear.univer.kharkov.ua/russ/p10_4_92.htm

Here is a link that confirms his presence in the Rukh splinter party DPU, from when he ran for elections in 1998: http://www.cvk.gov.ua/pls/vd2002/WEBPROC3V?kodvib=1&kodkand=2027

Let me know if this is satisfactory

147.194.15.73 (talk) 02:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Please add these to the Draft and then resubmit it for another review by adding to the top of it. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

05:58:40, 3 March 2015 review of submission by Debtang1019
Hey there, my article for submission got rejected. I'm not quite sure exactly the 'notability' and 'verifiability' of the links as I thought I've used secondary sources? Please let me know and help me in clarifying anything. Thanks! Debtang1019 (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Debtang1019 (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, Debtang1019. I looked over your list of sources, and there is definitely a problem.  Some are written directly by people in the company itself, including the conference talk descriptions.  Most of those that aren't are small mentions of the company in an article about some other topic, for example "Joe Smith from Emerging Strategy said...".  To show that this is a notable company, it will be necessary to find several extensive articles which are not press releases and which have been written by journalists, business analysts, or other professional authors in news reports, magazine articles, or books.  Personal opinions on forums such as Glass Door and Storify are not considered publications.  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

12:18:29, 3 March 2015 review of draft by Cliff.rigg
I have two questions: 1. My Lewis Hunton draft article requires a typo correcting in the title. Currently it reads "Lewis (also'Louis') Hunton" which is missing a space between the words 'also' and 'Louis' within the parentheses.

Could this missing space be added please so it reads "Lewis (also 'Louis') Hunton"?

2. The same article uses images taken by, and with the full permission of, a colleague who has provided proof of permission by e-mail. How do I get this proof to you?

Thanks very much for helping me with these problems.

Best regards...Cliff Rigg

Cliff.rigg (talk) 12:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

PAGE''' ]]) 15:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1. "Lewis (also 'Louis') Hunton" doesn't meet the article title guidelines. I have moved the article to Draft:Lewis Hunton, and if it is approved a redirect can be created from Louis Hunton→Lewis Hunton. 2. It's usually best to wait until the article is approved before adding images (especially ones with more complicated copyright situations), but you can get more information of sending permission at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

16:45:53, 3 March 2015 review of submission by Gript0n
Following an initial review last week, the Venn Digital page was deemed to require more citations in order to show notability. I have since made edits to the text and added additional references to support claims/add more value.

While I wait for a review, I'd like an opinion on the current state of the page and any specific improvements I could make. Any takers?

Thanks in advance! Gript0n (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * This Draft was reviewed for a second time yesterday, and declined again. See the reasons on the Draft page itself. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

16:54:58, 3 March 2015 review of submission by Polar teddy
Dear Wikipedia editors, I have submitted my first article about HighChem company, but it has been declined because it "appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". Would you be so kind and help me which parts need to be rewriten in this article? Thank you in advance for your time. Polar teddy (talk) 16:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I have moved this to HighChem. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

20:44:03, 3 March 2015 review of submission by 162.17.204.97
162.17.204.97 (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I have moved this to Benefitalign. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

20:49:44, 3 March 2015 review of draft by Davidgute
Hello, I've finished this article and would like to "release" it (to "publish" it), how do I do it? Thanks! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Fishelov Davidgute (talk) 20:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Add this template back in:, save and then press the submit button. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)