Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 16

= September 16 =

07:36:23, 16 September 2015 review of submission by Samuel Blaison
Samuel Blaison (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

07:51:04, 16 September 2015 review of submission by Kabirnahak
In wikipedia or on internet there are no substantial information on a word gooma. I am the owner of the company which is name as gooma. How to I write an article to include my company name and services into wikipedia? gooma (talk) 07:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You may find WP:BFAQ helpful. Worldbruce (talk) 07:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

09:02:05, 16 September 2015 review of submission by Samuel Blaison
Hello Sulfurboy, I have resubmitted content yesterday and got message " this submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability " What would be the actual reason. Is the reference link i gave is not much reliable or some other issues..Please let me know the actual reason. It will be appreciable if you give a guidance for the reason of rejection. Regards.Samuel Blaison (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Samuel Blaison (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Samuel Blaison (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No source is identified for the first nine paragraphs of Draft:Kauthuka Park. Do the TV programs cited in the recognition section support that content? Any statement a program supports should cite the program, giving at a minimum the title of the episode, the name of the series, the network, air date, language (if not English), and time at which the event occurs in the source (e.g. "5:12 minutes in"). It's good practice to include a direct quote in the citation as well, especially when the source is not in English, so long as the quote is not excessively long. The programs may be used as sources, and may be sufficient to demonstrate notability, but they appear to have been uploaded to YouTube in violation of copyright, so Wikipedia may not link to them - the urls must be removed. Worldbruce (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

12:50:00, 16 September 2015 review of submission by LMauney
Thank you for the feedback on my article submissions. All comments have been extremely helpful.

I completely understand the issue raised about article length and citation "bombardment" and will work on that.

However, one issue that keeps coming up in the rejection comments is a lack of verifiable citations. For my subject's past history, which is noteworthy to a degree, I am wondering how to verify anecdotal information when the subject was not a celebrity or figurehead for an operation, meaning that his work was behind-the-scenes and out of the media spotlight. The story itself is easily verifiable per the citations I found, but he is not mentioned by name. Do you have recommendations for how to handle that issue?

Beyond that, I plan to keep this article in draft mode until the citations can be addressed.

Thank you again.LMauney (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

LMauney (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

13:32:56, 16 September 2015 review of submission by Doctor Mellifluus
I am requesting a re-review because I have since edited the article with regard to length, peacock terminology, sources, and tone. Are there other aspects of the article I need to address before resubmitting?

Thank you for your time.

Doctor Mellifluus (talk) 13:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)