Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 21

= September 21 =

09:27:59, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Mystywave18

 * What is your question, please? Fiddle   Faddle  09:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Regarding to my concern on my submitted article draft name: "Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano", I just want to ask & clarify with it that why is it that many times I've already reviewed my article & submitted, is still not accepted/ rejected by the admins on this site? Is there anything wrong with it? I've already followed all the steps & instructions given regarding the errors that the admins send messages to my talk page and I've already fixed of it the article. I just want to tell all admin in general, that all of these contents on this article that I created are very legal, factual, informative & has a reliable source that all of the texts stated there are true & not by a fiction? For me, it is very disappointing. I just want to make assistance of it, why is it wrong? Give me some more clarifications & manifestations with it, since I've already revised anything on my article very accurately. If do so, I'm requesting to make some assistance with it, on how to fixed my article as soon as possible and I'm looking forward to your responses.

Mystywave18 (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Request on 10:16:53, 21 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mulan Pearce
Hello. I need help editing a wikipedia page. I have submitted an article for creation about 5/6 times and it has been rejected everytime. Reason being I require more sources. Some pages have just 1 or 2! How much more do I need to get the article approved? Kindly response ASAP as it has dragged on too long

Mulan Pearce (talk) 10:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * reviewed the material and gave you excellent advice. My opinion is that following that advice and then resubmitting it gives this draft an excellent chance of acceptance. I have not checked the referencing. So you are aware, for a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. IN addition, those links in the text need to go per WP:External links. Fiddle   Faddle  09:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

15:03:27, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Eric Inglert
I would like to remove my request to make (i.e., publish) this as an article at this time, because the reasons for publishing have changed. In addition, the article is not ready to be published. Is there a way for the original applicant to remove the request to publish?

Thanks.

Eric Inglert (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It has been removed from the pending queue. Worldbruce (talk) 18:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Many thanks Worldbruce. Eric Inglert (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Eric Inglert, just so you know, there is only one valid reason for adding anything to Wikipedia; to improve the encyclopedia. External considerations, motives or reasons are of no relevance at all. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you Roger (Dodger67) for sharing your thoughts. Eric Inglert (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * With a different title and lead this may actually be a candidate for main namespace anyway. I think it is about the website, not about the current title. Anyone fancy adopting it? Fiddle   Faddle  14:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

16:01:21, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Amitkumarsultania
Amitkumarsultania (talk) 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * What is your question, please? Fiddle   Faddle  09:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

16:22:01, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Vkjainautor
Vkjainautor (talk) 16:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC) I am not advertising, these are the lifetime achievement. Please guide how much of my submission is worth including in the encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkjainautor (talk • contribs) 16:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I cannot see a submission by you anywhere. Please enlighten us. Fiddle   Faddle  09:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

18:25:38, 21 September 2015 review of submission by PLDPR
1) Is it just the resources that need to be adjusted? Or does the content need to be edited too? 2) Would the likelihood of approval be higher if I included this topic under an umbrella topic like the Gold Rush?

Please offer any other advice you can think of that would help get this content approved. PLDPR (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

✅ with rationale on the article talk page. Fiddle  Faddle  09:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

20:46:14, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Nupur2000
Kiran Kamath has huge contribution in bollywood music. So can you please consider the article once again or help me with suggestion what else I can include to make it eligible


 * We will not write the article for you. What we will do is to give you guidance. I hope my comment on the draft itself is of some use to you. Fiddle   Faddle  09:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

22:17:53, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Cmurphey80
I submitted DiCentral for the third time to be reviewed. I waited almost three weeks just to have it turned down for the same reasons. To update the article I completely rewrote as I went through competitors that do have wiki pages to make sure it fit the notability guidelines. I followed several companies to get my third party resources. Sps Commerence, Opentext, and Trilogy Company. If they are accepted and we are not, I can't figure out what the difference is. Please advise.

Cmurphey80 (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * No precedent is ever set by any article for any other. If it were we would have a brutally fast descent into idiocracy. The best articles to look at as examples are in the WP:GA list, but even they do not set a precedent. I have left you a very full comment on the draft. Fiddle   Faddle  08:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

22:44:12, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Culinary84
I do not understand why it has been denied. I have a (2) after Richard Grausman as a mistake. How can I remove this? Culinary84 (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I have left you a comment on the draft. Fiddle   Faddle  08:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)