Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 24

= September 24 =

01:46:30, 24 September 2015 review of submission by Dpammm
This is the 1st article draft I've submitted for movement into the article space. It is an important topic.

The initial Article language is quite introductory & concise. This is by design: since this is my very first Article submission, I'd like it moved into the Article space to see whether any experienced editors take an interest in it and begin proposing changes to flesh it out. Since the subject matter is of strong importance, I'm hopeful it's a strong entry point for learning to create & manage a well-done Article. --

Please advise whether the approach I'm taking is correct, acceptable, likely to be approved, etc.

Thanks -- Dpammma (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Dpammma (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I have commented, albeit briefly, on the draft. Fiddle   Faddle  17:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

04:40:32, 24 September 2015 review of submission by Joannpowers
if the article is accepted I am not sure where you are going to post it  and if in more than one place - I would like it to go under local legend musicians, in Detroit, and in Michigan and perhaps under pop music, and 1970-1980's music.. thank you Joann Powers Joannpowers (talk) 04:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Joannpowers, the reviewer who accepts the draft would normally also see to the categorization, relevant WikiProjects would also help with such "finishing touches". Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

14:12:06, 24 September 2015 review of submission by Blackwhiteyellowred17
Someone rejected the article due to lack of notability. The company is almost 10 years old and has been referenced in "multiple reliable" news articles as required. It is one of only a handful of companies helping foreigners who want to find internship/work in China and if you are a person in that category, you probably have heard of them or used their service. Can anyone provide more references or advice to make it "notable"? Thanks. Blackwhiteyellowred17 (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Please only work on one Draft of the same article. I have only examined the first page listed above.


 * The Draft lists four apparently independent reliable sources which discuss the topic of internships in China for students over the age of 18 and young professionals. Of these four, I can only access two from here. Of these two, neither of them mention Gi2C Group at all. Because they do not mention Gi2C Group at all, they do not have significant coverage of Gi2C Group, and therefore cannot help in proving its notability by Wikipedia's standards. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 08:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I have edited the article to reflect the full name of Gi2C which is what the 2 articles mention. Would you say it's ok now? Blackwhiteyellowred17 (talk) 08:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

21:04:54, 24 September 2015 review of submission by 93.106.88.67
Hi, I translated a stub about a type of sausage from the German Wikipedia, but the draft was declined for lack of notability, yet it is considered notable enough to be included in the German wikipedia. It also has more references than the article on fuet (and about the same amount of information), yet fuet is considered notable enough and has not been put up for deletion. I would appreciate some help to make this article pass inspection.

A different question (and hopefully German speakers could help me here) is what the title of the article should be. I've come across various spellings - kaminwurz (About 7,530 results in Google), kaminwurzel (About 650 results), kaminwurzen (About 39,600 results), kaminwurz'n (About 966 results) - and I've no idea which one to use as the title of the article.

93.106.88.67 (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi. First, the different wikipedias have different standards of notability. Second, just because there are other articles which may or may not be notable is a other stuff exists argument, which usually isn't a good standard to base acceptance/declination/deletion on. The sausage exists, no doubt about it. But is it notable? My guess is it is. It certainly looks delicious, and I wish I had one right now. You're right, there are plenty of articles on the List of sausages which aren't even as well referenced as this one. Resubmit it, and see if another editor feels differently.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

21:40:51, 24 September 2015 review of submission by 205.206.134.248
205.206.134.248 (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

I have prepared an article for submission. It has been rejected several times. Will someone go through it with me and assist me? Solopreneur

Thank you.

Roy


 * You need to tell us what it is. May I suggest that you register an account and work on it from there? Fiddle   Faddle  22:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)