Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 25

= September 25 =

12:08:13, 25 September 2015 review of submission by Tsoydarya
FIRST TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING A RE-REVIEW ON THE LINE BELOW THIS LINE. Take as many lines as you need. -->}} I edit my article many times, but something is uncorrect again, I want understand what should i change for publish this article successfully? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsoydarya (talk • contribs) 12:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * ✅ though I feel it is borderline. References require improvement. Fiddle   Faddle  17:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

13:36:30, 25 September 2015 review of submission by Bvweelde
Bvweelde (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Problem: I'm writing an article about an already deceased author who lived, more or less in a seclusion (Jesuit community). He questioned many of the do's and more particularly the don'ts about the Order of Jesus Christ (the Jesuit Order). As of that he was expelled. He left a list of books. Unfortunately there's little or nothing known of him. After he left the Order, the author married and had some off-spring of which one is still alive. All publishers he worked with do not exist anymore. This all makes it nearly impossible for me to put notable information inside the article. Still, the works of the author are too much worth to ignore, especially now his most important work has become popular again. What to do now?


 * The only answer is to research and to hope. Wikipedia cannot be the repository of all the world's knowledge, only of that verified or verifiable in reliable sources. This potentially important gentleman may slip through the cracks. Fiddle   Faddle  17:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Pinging since this may interest them. They often know where to look when others do not.  Fiddle   Faddle  17:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

16:20:56, 25 September 2015 review of submission by Asdiprizio
Asdiprizio (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

I created an article that was rejected because it was "inappropriate". I wanted to become part of a vocal minority of women who give voice to notable women. the notable woman in question is Khaki Jones. as one of the few women writers in animation in 1992, her 17 year rise at Cartoon Network was more than notable. where is the love? if someone cares about this topic, or gender equality in general, or has a heart for a newbie at Wikipedia, I humbly beseech you for help in getting this good and great woman known. by all appearances, it seems she is happy to live in the shadows. this is a woman's struggle. is it yours as well? thank you. hearts. Asdiprizio (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Khaki_Jones Draft:Khaki_Jones Asdiprizio (talk) 16:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Asdiprizio (talk). Your submission was declined as unsuitable for Wikipedia because of issues with prose and formatting -- it doesn't have anything to do with gender.  It looks like there are plenty of sources you can use to tell Khaki Jones' story -- look here for guidance on writing a good article. Ping me if you need help. JSFarman (talk) 23:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

18:11:17, 25 September 2015 review of submission by Tujohn (ImAgroup)
Tujohn (talk) 18:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC) 18:11:17, 25 September 2015 review of submission by Tujohn (ImAgroup) I want to know why my Article for creation was declined and how long will i be on probation before i will be allowed to create my own article.


 * It does not appear to be an article.
 * Editors with accounts may create articles very soon indeed after registration. I suggest, though, that you learn your trade here before creating articles willy nilly.
 * If your purpose here is self promotion I advise you against it. It always fails. Fiddle   Faddle  20:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

18:26:58, 25 September 2015 review of submission by Kmsecrest
Hello, I believe I have edited the submission to better adhere to Wikipedia standards. However, I am having some difficulty with the "Reliable Sources" criteria. There aren't any neutral 3rd party sources that have reported on the topic of F5 Professional Certification. It's a fairly new program in the world of IT/Professional certification. I have not been able to find any news articles or published sources that deal with this topic. The only information available thus far has been from the F5 website and blog posts from current participants in the program.

Is it possible to have an entry that only references primary sources?

The F5 Professional Certification entry is modeled after these related Wikipedia articles: Network administrator Cisco Certifications CWNA Red Hat

Also, I want to thank the Wikipedia community and the editors that have commented or flagged this post so far. I appreciate the time, energy and care demonstrated by the individual editors, writers and participants.

Thank you for your help.


 * If what you say is correct, specifically "There aren't any neutral 3rd party sources that have reported on the topic of F5 Professional Certification", then Wikipedia does not yet need an article about F5 Professional Certification. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 08:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)