Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 29

= September 29 =

02:25:14, 29 September 2015 review of submission by James Galbreath
Jimmy Don Smith (talk) 02:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC) Thank you but I am very disappointed. No reason to try and spread the Choctaw problems. Might be a organization that is a bit racist.


 * I have answered 's earlier question. This appears to be a follow on, but the intervening material appears to be absent. Fiddle   Faddle  06:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Request on 14:08:01, 29 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ReubenGeary
I work for the outdoors clothing company Sprayway. I spent a significant amount of time this morning putting together a page for the brand to be on Wikipedia only for it to be deleted this afternoon. The claims against the page a ridiculous, saying it is copyright when the text comes from our own website but has been directly copied by another and is being alerted as copyright when it is our text. 2nd is the claim it is advertising. It is not in any respect advertising, its only putting information about the brand and its 40 years of history on Wikipedia for people to see. No different to Berghaus, Regatta, Craghoppers etc who have pages on wikipedia.

Id like some assistance and a re-review on the deleted page so changes can be made for it to be reploaded thanks Reuben Geary Sprayway ReubenGeary (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:Donating copyright material.
 * No-one has the slightest idea that you have been using their text with permission. That is why it has been deleted. We protect copyrights strenuously.
 * With regard to your working for them, thank you for disclosing this matter. Please read WP:COI and Paid-contribution disclosure, and follow them
 * Please never approach a matter like this with anything other than humility. Please also recognise that text made for a promotional website is unlikely to be acceptable in a Wikipedia article. Fiddle   Faddle  16:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

16:12:23, 29 September 2015 review of submission by 198.109.114.137
198.109.114.137 (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Religious fanatics on Wikipedia have twice opposed and defeated an article about me from being created. What can I do about receiving a fair and evenhanded appraisal from Wikipedia? Where do I appeal?

Please provide a link. Thank you.

198.109.114.137 (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * It depends what you are appealing. Perhaps you should start by linking to the draft concerned and we might offer you advice. Fiddle   Faddle  16:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Here's the pages that I can find on Wikipedia in back files or something. I have continued to publish and receive an extensive worldwide recognition of my writing but am still not in Wikipedia because of this opposition:

At the time the “Frederick Glaysher” article on Wikipedia was under debate in 2008, Wjhonson observed,

"Their only purpose is to attack Glaysher. This del entry should be voided on that basis solely...." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2008_April_4#Frederick_Glaysher

"The attacks imho are religion-based as this person is a vocal critic of certain Baha'i institutions. There is no evidence that his works are vanity-press publications. The article is fairly new and deserves new eyes to expand it, instead of this pressure by a vested group or a few individuals to suppress it. Wjhonson 4 April 2008" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Frederick_Glaysher — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.109.114.137 (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * You are at an inappropriate forum. We deal with draft articles and their acceptance. We do not move questions to the correct forum, preferring to leave that to the questioner
 * Please understand that you have no automatic right to a page on Wikipedia about you. If you pass WP:BIO then it is likely in the fullness of time that a page may be created.
 * You should ask for advice quietly and politely at WP:Teahouse where you may ask questions of this nature and receive well considered replies. I suggest to you very strongly that you eschew terms such as 'religious fanatic', these are terms that are likely to get your question sidelined.
 * Do you pass WP:BIO? Are there independent references about you? For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources.
 * I suggest you register for an account. It will make asking questions and receiving answers much easier. Fiddle   Faddle  16:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * A better link to the location to ask your questions is at Teahouse/Questions where there is a big blue button to click to help you with asking your question. Please help yourself by not simply copying all this material nor by posting a question while frustrated. The folk there will react far better to a well considered question than anything that could be perceived as emotional. Fiddle   Faddle  16:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * This question has now been posed at the Teahouse. If you have advice for the editor, please offer it there. Fiddle   Faddle  17:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Request on 20:37:36, 29 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Wwchopper
I'm trying to get something started to help other people and myself as well as my girlfriend this is very bad situation for any one to be in. I have gone through it and it is about over, and I want to help other people that have or going through this same situation because there is no help for us. It makes it very difficult.

Wwchopper (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I fear that you may have mistaken the purpose of Wikipedia. It is an encyclopaedia. I agree that what you have been through is unpleasant, but this web site is not the place to get help, nor to give it. We are concerned only with recording things that are notable in a Wikipedia sense that have been reported by others in reliable sources. Fiddle   Faddle  22:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

21:04:36, 29 September 2015 review of submission by Marykasz
This article has been rejected as "not adequately supported by reliable sources." But the sources include an official US government page (State Department bio: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/bureau/234900.htm) and newspaper articles including POLITICO and Washington Jewish Week. Are these not reliable sources? Or does it need more citations?

Thanks for your help!


 * I have left you what I hope to be a helpful comment on the draft itself. Fiddle   Faddle  22:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

21:30:24, 29 September 2015 review of submission by Hayleyannv
Why was my article declined?

Hayleyannv (talk) 21:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I expect you read the message on your talk page and on the draft itself. That gives you a rather solid steer towards the answer. Fiddle   Faddle  21:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

23:21:04, 29 September 2015 review of submission by Lovedayslikethis
New to the Wikipedia world of creating articles, I am requesting assistance to improve my article of the draft The Masaya Mission so that under the next article reviewing it will be approved and visible to Wikipedia when searched on the search engine. Being a draft, I know it is not perfect however, I am finding difficulty in understanding why it was not approved in the first place. It was written in a neutral tone and informative. Please help me improve The Masaya Mission draft. Your help and assistance is greatly appreciated. Lovedayslikethis (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I have left a comment on your draft which is intended to help you. Please ask any questions if you are unsure how to proceed after reading it. Fiddle   Faddle  09:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)