Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 April 26

= April 26 =

13:14:39, 26 April 2016 review of submission by Cohu
Dear Wikipedia member,

My article is not accepted because the references are considered as not independant from the subject. I do not understand how a reference can be independant from the subject. Since they have to be related to each other. Also, I checked the other wikipedia page in the same context, as the Nobel Prize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize and most of its references are related to its main website. I kindly ask you to review, and help me by indicating how I could improve this page.

Thanks in advance for your support

Best regards, Constance


 * Hi . The essays Independent sources and Third-party sources may help you understand. Coverage in sources like Time, BBC News, or Jyllands-Posten is what Wikipedia is looking for. Coverage by entities closely connected to the prize, such as the founders, sponsors, or recipients, cannot establish that it is notable. It may be unrealistic of you to expect a prize that has yet to be awarded to have had the significant and demonstrable effects that would justify its inclusion in Wikipedia. It may be simply too soon to show significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

18:17:58, 26 April 2016 review of submission by David V. Edgeworth
I need to change the title of the draft - and there aren't any obvious way of doing so. I want to introduce an Anglicisation of the artist's first name by dropping the 's' at the end of 'Arnolds'. In Latvian, a first name like his would attract an 's' at the end. In English this sounds odd and I am fairly sure that he would have lost the 's' in professional and social situations when in English speaking company. I have deleted this particular 's' throughout the rest of the draft (at least I hope I have done so).


 * It is simple to re-title a page, once one knows that Wikipedia calls this "moving" a page to a new name. WP:MOVE explains how. However, the article title should be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, as demonstrated by reliable published sources. So although it's natural to assume that upon moving to England he may have Anglicised his name (formally or informally), without evidence that English-language sources most commonly refer to him that way, the 's' should not be dropped in the title or in the body of the draft.


 * You have described the images you uploaded to commons as your own work, which is inaccurate. Photographs of two-dimensional paintings do not generate a new copyright. The copyright remains with the painter, who is not you. The photographs of the paintings must be removed from commons. You may be able to claim fair use and upload some of them to Wikipedia (not commons) if they meet all 10 of the criteria for fair use and are essential to a reader's understanding of Mazitis. See Image use policy and Non-free content. From the appearance of the portrait, although it may be mathematically possible for you to be the photographer, it seems unlikely. If you were the photographer, can you provide more detail about when and where it was taken? Worldbruce (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

18:52:36, 26 April 2016 review of submission by JTNwriter
4/26/16 Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Inspire_%28company%29 Hi, I believe I have made improvements to my submission and would welcome feedback before I resubmit for consideration. I have made a formal disclosure as to my relationship with Inspire, for whom I work. I have removed the peacock terms and what were flagged as sources not acceptable to Wikipedia, and added more authoritative sources. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd appreciate your guidance. Thanks in advance, John Novack (JTNwriter)JTNwriter (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)