Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 June 17

= June 17 =

05:29:39, 17 June 2016 review of submission by 79.179.106.43
79.179.106.43 (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

05:29:39, 17 June 2016 review of submission by 79.179.106.43

I submitted an article whose title Is ALIZA Ziv on June 16, 2016.IN ENGLISH I received an answer from Kyle Tastic, ‪KylieTastic‬ השאיר הודעה בדף השיחה שלך בפסקה "‪Your submission at Articles for creation: עליז...‬".

Since I submitted the the article in English I cannot understand what has happened


 * I don't see a problem here, the draft is at Draft:Aliza Ziv, see Referencing for beginners to help you fix the referencing. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

08:00:22, 17 June 2016 review of submission by 190.44.139.201
190.44.139.201 (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

08:02:34, 17 June 2016 review of submission by 190.44.139.201

Is anyone going to get round to reviewing the page? been over a month now!!

11:01:10, 17 June 2016 review of submission by RIT RAJARSHI

 * Hi RIT RAJARSHI - all you need to do is click on the blue "Resubmit" button in the pink review box. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC) (the "Ask Question" button of the page User:RIT RAJARSHI/Granatane took me here. I'm doing this particular edit on this help-page,  because I misunderstood the Wikicodes given in the form, and What I already typed on that help-page, was not saved.)

I created the 2 draft-pages, on Granatane (User:RIT RAJARSHI/Granatane)  and Granatanine (Draft:Granatanine). ( Originally I attempted to create the pages because I did not knew how-to request an article).

Though the created-draft-pages failed at review (because I could provide so-little informations). But still, I think, there is encyclopedic notability of these 2 topics. Because... the terms, Granatane and Granatanine, are often-used in the field of Alkaloids (Some alkaloids, allied to tropane, such as pseudopelletierine contains them in backbone), natural-products organic-chemistry, drug-action, Ligand-receptor interaction ( such as Sigma-2_receptor ) etc.

But when I started search web on the main, backbone compound (and nomenclatural origin) compounds 9-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane  (Granatanine ),  and 9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-3-amine (Granatane ), I could not found useful informations throughout web ( so I tried to request the article and attempted to create the drafts).

So, I request for 2 articles on Granatanine and Granatane.

Thanks RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I have added Granatane and Granatanine to Requested articles/Natural sciences/Chemistry on your behalf. That list is quite long, so it might be years before anyone writes those articles. If you're willing to keep working on the drafts you started, you may be able to get assistance from WikiProject Chemistry to improve the drafts to the point where they could be accepted as at least stubs. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * , Thank you very much, However, I have so little amount of information that i'm frightened to start them even as draft. You could inform that wikiproject-chemistry domain, or may inform(give link) me, if it is separately required to adding there.


 * I also request you to give me a link, where that submission by you published or listed. Because I'm not expert in computer. RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * As far as links are concerned: Articles may be requested at Requested articles. The specific sub-page where Granatane and Granatanine have been requested is Requested articles/Natural sciences/Chemistry. You may wish to add one or more of those pages to your watchlist, so that you will see, when you check your watchlist, any progress on the requests. It may take a long time. In the past two years I've requested three other articles; only one has been written so far. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

15:12:44, 17 June 2016 review of submission by Bronka2016

 * He is notable because he received (posthumously) Poland's highest military award. In order to accept the article, a reference is needed to a reliable source stating that he received the award.  Please provide the reference, and the article can be accepted.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

19:38:26, 17 June 2016 review of submission by Hmlarson

 * 1) No Wikipedia policy was cited in the final reviewer's declining explanation. The previous reviewer said he was about to approve it and then disappeared.  I'd like to know why Rodan is not considered notable given the references included in the draft and according to which policy?
 * 2) The final reviewer also made significant edits that removed relevant content and references to support Rodan's notability as an author and expert on cosmetic dermatology in addition to being notable as female entrepreneur1, and dermatologist. He then states, "She may be great but she has only few or no mentions outside her area of expertise and money." I'd like someone else to review this and the reviewers edits and provide feedback. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Hmlarson (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hmlarson, I was going to add references that were specifically about Katie Rodan in order to address the issues raised in previous AfDs but ran out of time. I will continue to search; I find it hard to believe that there aren't refs that concretely establish her notability. JSFarman (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: similar article for a male cosmetic dermatology expert here: Fredric Brandt Hmlarson (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)