Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 March 10

= March 10 =

01:59:17, 10 March 2016 review of submission by Mim.cis
I would like to change the title from Beg_Dense_Image_Matching_via_LDDMM to a title that is more generic along thelines that I followed to make it accpetable. To introduce "Diffeomorphic Mapping" as a general field with Beg's version a particular one etc.....

How do I change the wiki page to have the title wiki/Diffeomorphic_Mapping

i KNOW HOW TO USE redirect SO ONCE i HAVE THE PROPER TITLE WHICH IS GENERIC i CAN THEN REDIRECT SUCH MORE PARTICULAR ONES LIKE beg_..... TO THE MORE GENERIC.

Mim.cis (talk) 01:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello, please see WP:Move page for how to change a title. Absolutely do not simply copy-paste the current page onto a new one, use the Move tools to make sure the page history is properly recorded. If you have trouble, inquire at WP:Teahouse for help. MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

05:19:16, 10 March 2016 review of submission by Rajesh ghangurde
Need help regarding my draft page 'Kokan Region'. Reviewer had raised question regarding my submissions and would want to reply to it. I have already edited the Draft and resend for review. however i would also like to highlight that there is no separate page as 'KOKAN' mentioned in Wikipedia in regard to coastal Maharashtra while we have separate pages for Nort, South Goa and Karavalli and Kanara although they too are part of 'Konkan' please admit the citation. regards. Rajesh ghangurde (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello, the main problem is that you simply make a case for how you think Kokan and Konkan are two different things, but what you must do is show that some experts believe that they are two distinct things. A Wikipedia article is not a place for your to present your argument and justify it, it's to show other experts' arguments. Do you have any citations to news articles, books, etc. where an expert writer lays out the case that these are not simply two words for the same place? MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

07:14:05, 10 March 2016 review of submission by MIFTWA
WE ARE A NGO ORGANIZATION SET UP TO LOOK IN TO THE SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA OF FILM AND TV IN MALAYSIA. ALL THE WORKSHOPS,SEMINARS ARE FREE OF CHARGE FOR THE MALAYSIAN INDIANS.WE TRAIN THE SCHOOL DROPOUTS,SINGLE MOTHERS,AND YOUTHS WHO WANTS TO START A SMALL BUSINESS RELATED TO MULTI MEDIA OR MEDIA STUDIES.

MIFTWA (talk) 07:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello, you have not written an article that is ready to publish. We don't need you to come and advocate for why you think your NGO is great, we need you to follow the suggestions we have given you to improve the article. Have you read the guidance in the pink boxes at the top? Do you have any questions for us about how to follow that guidance? You must follow that guidance if you want the article to publish, we will not publish an unready article simply because it sounds like a good cause. MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

08:33:30, 10 March 2016 review of submission by Davitashvilli
Good afternoon, i'm interested in what is to add to said page, what sources are counted as relevant and so on. Basically we are a small and cose museum with sole goal of motivating future generations. And as a museum - the wiki page is really helpful thing. Since both Wlad and Vitaliy Klitchko are common people to visit us - getting "proved\authentic" is not a problem. So really need a hand in creating page, never done it before so it is rather challenging and fun at same time.

Davitashvilli (talk) 08:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You do not just need to prove it exists, you also need to prove ti generated sufficient attention (see WP:N) and is described in what we call reliable sources (WP:RS). These sources do not need to be in English, they can be in Ukrainian or Russian or Georgian or whatever, but they need to be reliable. Museums usually stand a good chance of being notable, but you need to demonstrate it.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rita Moussa
16:23:50, 10 March 2016 review of submission by 66.131.69.248

hello i am contacting you because i would like the following url o be deleted from the internet and from the history. thank you

http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/Wikipedia_talk%3AArticles_for_creation%2FRita_Moussa


 * Hello, that site is not a Wikipedia site, it is a mirror website that copies from here that Wikipedia does not control. We cannot do anything to help you, you must contact the administrators of that site. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

20:34:45, 10 March 2016 review of submission by Aali451
Hi there,

Thank you for your review of this submission. I added more newspaper articles and award demonstrating the notable subject. Would you please specifically let me know what kind of sources I need to add in the references?

Thank you,

Aali
 * Replied on user talk page. Worldbruce (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Request on 22:32:59, 10 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Tydero
Tydero (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)