Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 November 20

= November 20 =

20:41:21, 20 November 2016 review of submission by Pogga D
I am not at all clear what is meant in this context by reliable resources. The books are there, the reviews and references are there. Some, admittedly unpublished, are letters in my possession. I really do not see what I can do to address this.Pogga D (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi it seems like you have not read the review comment. The draft does not contain enough references, whole paragraphs have none. Basically every substantive claim should have a source. Unpublished material cannot be used at all. The fact that you posess such letters implies that you have a close connection to the subject, please read the conflict of interst giudeline -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

20:56:23, 20 November 2016 review of submission by Dannadel
Hello, I submitted my article for review about 4 weeks ago, so I'm just curious if there's anything further I need to do make sure it gets published. Please let me know. Thank you, Dan Nadel

Dannadel (talk) 20:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello . Unfortunately AfC is very backlogged at the moment, so the only thing you can do is be patient! Joe Roe (talk) 14:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)