Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 October 15

= October 15 =

02:15:15, 15 October 2016 review of submission by Chen xiaojing
Chen xiaojing (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Your draft is blank. You submitted it, and it was declined, and you resubmitted it anyway.  Please do not waste our time with blank submissions.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

06:32:02, 15 October 2016 review of submission by 217.210.31.244
The Family Home Entertainment article has been redirected to Artisan Entertainment, so I'm trying to revive the article with more sources. Can someone help out with this please? 217.210.31.244 (talk) 06:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The redirect to Artisan Entertainment was done pursuant to a decision made at Articles for Deletion last month. And all you've done here is recreate that old article, and then add some bare URL's at the end.  You might consider requesting a WP:Deletion Review of last month's decision, but I don't see much chance of getting that decision overturned.  You'll likely have better luck by going to the Talk page at Talk:Artisan Entertainment and starting a discussion there about merging some of the information from the old article into the Artisan article.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * What that draft needs is not more sources, it's better sources. It currently has over 80 sources, most (maybe all?) of them worthless. A link to the result of a Google search is never an acceptable source. Maproom (talk) 07:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I added more source links here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Family_Home_Entertainment#More_references So can you please use the more reliable ones to add new information? 187.113.203.102 (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No, but you can find more reliable sources rather than expecting volunteers here to do a job for you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

07:04:13, 15 October 2016 review of submission by 217.210.31.244
Does this revival of the TVPaint article look good now? 217.210.31.244 (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No. It cites no sources. Maproom (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I added source links here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TVPaint#References Can you please use them along with http://wiki.tvpaint.com/index.php?title=TVPaint to write more information on the pagge? 187.113.203.102 (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No. I am a volunteer here, and I have better ways to use my time. How about you do it yourself? This response also applies to the preceding item on this page. Maproom (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I can't do it myself, it takes up a lot of time. Why don't you do all the rewriting similar to (and not copied directly from) the TVPaintWiki article and using the sources I put? 85.196.227.118 (talk) 22:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Because you would have to pay us more than you are paying us now. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

08:24:17, 15 October 2016 review of submission by Kahorere
Kahorere (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:NOT.  JTP ( talk • contribs) 14:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

12:35:42, 15 October 2016 review of submission by Renata.sarno
Hi, my name is Renata Sarno, I wrote an article about a disease, Blue Cone Monochromacy, BCM. I tried to follow all the instructions about references, external links, sources and many people affected by Blue Cone Monochromacy read the article and find it very useful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Blue_Cone_Monochromacy

I tried several times to submit it and, as there is a page named 'Monochromacy', there is not the possibility to submit a page about BCM. 'Monochromacy' is not the name of a disease, it could be in some patients just one between several symptoms that BCM people show.

I was wondering why a human disease (OMIM 303700) cannot have a wikipedia page !?

Renata SarnoRenata.sarno (talk) 12:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Renata.sarno (talk) 12:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I see that there has been extended discussion about this on the Talk page Talk:Monochromacy. Whether or not this particular form of monochromacy should have a separate article will be best decided at that venue.  You might consider starting a Request for Comments there.  For information about such Requests, please see WP:RFC.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

14:06:09, 15 October 2016 review of submission by 2A02:C7D:CA94:B500:31B4:90F2:5D65:1C35
I would like to know why my article was declined. 2A02:C7D:CA94:B500:31B4:90F2:5D65:1C35 (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You'll need to specify the article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You must have been using a different IP address when you submitted the draft. The shifting of IP addresses, which results in not having a stable edit history, is an advantage to creating an account.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

21:17:36, 15 October 2016 review of submission by Gencler2015

 * Hi please see the Referencing for beginners guide. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)