Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 October 21

= October 21 =

Request on 00:33:33, 21 October 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Abbeydurkin
Hi, My name is Dr. Abbey Durkin and I am writing a wiki entry for Dr. George Everly. He is one of the founding fathers of critical incident stress debriefing, has hundreds of publications, international presentations, presidents of multiple academic and professional associations, editor and chief of journals, and still holds a faculty position with Johns Hopkins. I am truly perplexed that the feedback I have been provided cites "significance" and requests more references. There are almost 60 independent publications included in this entry. I have been going back and forth with the editors for months and need this resolved. Please help me move this very important entry into the public space, As Soon As Possible- Respectfully, Dr. Abbey Durkin Abbeydurkin (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, Abby. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia.  The best sources of information as to why your submission was declined are the reviewers who have already looked at it.  Their names and talk-page buttons appear at the top of the submission.  Before posting here, I took a look at the submission and found that I agree that this article is not ready for publication.  There are two overarching problems.  The first is that you provide a good deal of information about the subject, without telling the reader where this information came from.  Information on Wikipedia must be explicitly referenced to reliable sources, and your submission contains no references whatsoever.  The second problem is that you have not demonstrated that the subject is sufficiently "notable" in the sense that Wikipedia uses that word.  Wikipedia makes no independent determination of whether a subject is worthy of notice.  Instead, we look to see whether the subject has received significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  Here, too, your submission fails to provide any evidence.  Before re-submitting, you might to take a look at our introductions to the need for, and uses of, sources.  These are at WP:RS and WP:REFB.  I hope this has been helpful.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

22:54:46, 21 October 2016 review of draft by Megrumpy
I have just inserted a link to a website www.360cities.net This has been rejected as being blacklisted. It seems a very reputable long existing site to me. Why is it blocked?

Megrumpy (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * For general background on the spam blacklist, see Spam blacklist. 360cities.net is on the Wikimedia-wide blacklist Spam blacklist. The best explanation of why is in these four log entries:
 * m:Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2011-11
 * m:Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2012-05
 * m:Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2013-04
 * m:Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2015-04
 * --Worldbruce (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)