Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 September 1

= September 1 =

Request on 08:15:39, 1 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 223.104.177.243
223.104.177.243 (talk) 08:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The only references that you have provided are the company's own in three languages, which is not independent coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Request on 09:01:01, 1 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ksanjida
This submission's references does not adequately show the subject's notability. It needs more coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. and needs substance for established independent notability. Ksanjida (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

13:06:51, 1 September 2016 review of submission by Destructo84
I am unsure what other coverage is needed since I have submitted with numerous independent reliable sources which are the same as other network management software companies. I don't know how many are expected then since companies like Solarwinds reliable sources links don't even exist. When you click on them to verify it leads to a page not found, 404 error, etc. The company Entuity is mentioned by Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, eWeek, The Business Journals, Techworld, EMA, Marketwired, Infoworld, Networkworld and there are independent studies behind a paywall that can be referenced as well. I am never given a clear answer as to what is needed.

Destructo84 (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The draft is Draft:Entuity. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you have a connection with the company? Robert McClenon (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

23:14:43, 1 September 2016 review of submission by 223.104.177.151
223.104.177.151 (talk) 23:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC) The page about Luke Shen-Tien Chi was reject the third time. I believe he has enough significant resource for a approval. Who can reconsider?


 * The draft is Draft:Luke Shen-Tien Chi. The draft states that he is the founder of a field of study, but the name of the field of study is simply a neologism; the study of spoken communication has been a field of scholarship since ancient times.  The draft provides no actual evidence that he has made any notable contributions to scholarship.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)