Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 September 30

= September 30 =

00:47:17, 30 September 2016 review of submission by Pentuin
{{Lafc|username=Pentuin|ts=00:47:17, 30 September 2016|page= 00:47:17, 30 September 2016 review of submission by {{SUBST:REVISIONUSER} }} It's not clear to me what more I could possibly do to document Armor's history. The newspaper articles I referenced referred to his position during the Reagan administration, and most of his other history and writing is voluminously supported. His schooling and academic positions are all listed on his online CV. About the only thing I was unable to document was the bit at the end about where he is living now, and the details about his wife. It this point I'd appreciate some specific guidance on what else I can document. Some further biographical details and more personal information will be published soon, but probably not until 2017. The main issue has to do with providing information about his contributions to early statistical packages used for sociological research, which is of historical importance as we enter the digital era. Pentuin (talk) 00:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The draft in question is Draft:David J. Armor. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

12:12:10, 30 September 2016 review of submission by Mason Loades
Hi Help Desk!! Could you tell me the time frame it takes to get a draft submission checked? Is it done in a queue syetem? If I edit the article does it revert to the back of the queue again? Thanks in advance Mase :-) Mason Loades (talk) 12:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

13:44:09, 30 September 2016 review of submission by Landoflizards
Is the Atlanta Journal Constitution an independent enough source?????
 * Do you want User:Landoflizards/Education Unleashed or Draft:Education Unleashed reviewed? There are two copies of your draft, which is not your fault but is due to an edit conflict between reviewers.  If you want the version in user space reviewed, please tag the version in draft space for deletion so that the user version can be moved into its place.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

13:48:58, 30 September 2016 review of submission by RG92DE
Hello; I thought I created a factual record of a very significant urban and social innovation, but was told that it was an 'essay'. The subject is certainly worthy of inclusion (I supplied the reference website links of what was created too). So I dont really know how to proceed (or just give up)... Thanks RG92DE (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The draft in question is Draft:Capital of Children (Børnenes Hovedstad). It has a promotional tone, which is the reason for the decline.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You provided the link to its own web site, but that is not an independent source. Notability is based on independent sources that provide in-depth coverage.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

14:22:39, 30 September 2016 review of draft by NeheScar
I submitted my article for review on August 12th, but I haven't heard back. Also, I continue to get this message that says this draft is not submitted for review. Have I done something wrong?

NeheScar (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Your draft has been submitted for review. Your draft contains external links in the article body.  They are not permitted.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

15:34:25, 30 September 2016 review of submission by Klkraft
Klkraft (talk) 15:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

In the Wikipedia "Search" box, if one clicks "containing kenneth kraft" (the second option), the list of results begins with this message: You may create the page "Kenneth kraft", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.

Please correct that first line to read: There is a page named "Kenneth Kraft" on Wikipedia.

Thank you in advance.


 * Hi Klkraft - Search terms are case sensitive (except for the first letter) so "kenneth kraft" and "Kenneth Kraft" are actually different searches, but "kenneth kraft" and "Kenneth kraft" are treated as the same. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, you, User:Klkraft, have a conflict of interest and should not be editing the article, although you may request edits on Talk:Kenneth Kraft in particular in order to correct errors. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

18:32:43, 30 September 2016 review of submission by DanSheman
My name is Jannie Wolff and I'm writing on behalf of Dan Sherman. I am looking over this article again to edit it for re-submission and I saw a note that because it has not been edited in six months it is eligible for deletion so I wanted to make sure you knew that we are working on it. Any suggestions you have before we resubmit it would be greatly appreciated. In looking it over it seems that Dan Sherman has added several reliable sources, so please let us know your thoughts on its current form as we would like to successfully resubmit it.

Blessings,

Jannie


 * Hi - According to the history of the draft page nobody has edited it since the 6th of March this year, so I do not understand what you mean by "we are working on it". You need to actually edit the page ASAP to stop the deletion from going ahead. Another problem is that you and Dan Sherman are not allowed to edit from a single shared user account. You, Jannie Wolff, should register your own user account immediately and use only it to edit. User accounts may only be used by a single individual, shared or group accounts are not permitted in terms of the attribution requirements of the CC BY-SA 3.0 License that applies to all contributions to Wikipedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)