Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 December 1

= December 1 =

03:31:29, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Myuvaraj17
I have created a new article for a laundry company. How can confirm whether the article is submitted for review or not? May I get an email notification after the review successful? how can track this article submission? Myuvaraj17 (talk) 03:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi . Draft:Fabricspa has been submitted for review. Its status is indicated in the yellow box at the top of the page. There is currently a backlog of over 2000 submissions so I'm afraid it will take some time to be reviewed. You can track it using your watchlist and get email notifications by ticking "Email me when a page or a file on my watchlist is changed" in your preferences. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

04:15:33, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Nateannoyingkerkhoff
I submitted my article for review and was declined. The reason was clear, fair, and helpful. I am missing notable sources, but my page is for an organization that is not from the United States. We are currently translating material, but most of the sources are in Korean. What is the best way to approach this? Nateannoyingkerkhoff (talk) 04:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi . Feel free to cite the sources in Korean. Whilst this is the English Wikipedia and English sources are preferred for our readers' convenience, if they are not available then sources in other languages are perfectly acceptable. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

could you tell us what the article is? We might be better able to help you Egaoblai (talk) 11:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC) NMever mind found it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UniKorea_Foundation I think you just need one or two sources to help the article on it's way. At the moment there's just one source. Has the foundation been featured in any newspapers, magazine articles or books or NGO reports etc? Egaoblai (talk) 11:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

09:48:19, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Chiaradalmaso2
The English voice about Filarmonica is considered as missing Reliable Sources. I don't get what it means actually. Could you address me through the steps to solve it out? Thanks very much Chiaradalmaso2 (talk) 09:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello . On Wikipedia every piece of information should be referenced to an external, reliable source. Your draft currently has no references, which means that none of the information can be verified by others. You will need to add references to where you got the information from. For instructions on how to format them see referencing for beginners. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

12:34:44, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Lisaconnick
Draft:Lily Cassandra Alphonsis

Lisaconnick (talk) 12:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I have had to delete this draft as it could be considered libel. I don't know anything this woman and my main thoughts about Harvey Weinstein are "how come he's getting just desserts while Donald Trump is getting off scot free?", but we cannot write about accusations of criminal behaviour without excellent and well-respected third party sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

16:00:08, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Tihonata
Good evening, question is whow long it will take to publish article?

Tihonata (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC) 16:00:08, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Tihonata


 * Unfortunately things are quite backlogged here. We have some submissions that have been in the review queue for nearly two months. Reviewers here are WP:VOLUNTEERS and decide for themselves which submissions to review so things are not always reviewed in the order they're received. ~Kvng (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

19:43:34, 1 December 2017 review of submission by Fritzgoebel
It may not be clear where this proposed page, 'Named passenger trains of the United States', belongs in Wikipedia. My idea is that the page 'Lists of named Passenger Trains', will link to it, while the proposed page will then itself link to the pages of alphabetized lists of American trains. In short, the proposed page provides background for the Wikipedia user to help them understand that there can never be a 'definitive' list of named American trains, given that there is often uncertainly about whether a train designation is really a name or just a description.

Fritzgoebel (talk) 19:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I would think this is something you should discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains or Talk:Lists of named passenger trains. We have an active community of Wikipedia editors dealing with rail topics. ~Kvng (talk) 22:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)