Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 July 25

= July 25 =

Request on 02:24:56, 25 July 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Giteshs78
Please help me a write a Article...

Gitesh Sharma 02:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * NOTE: Draft has been deleted. NewYorkActuary (talk) 11:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

05:31:42, 25 July 2017 review of submission by Omar rafikkk
Omar rafikkk (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Can someone please help with the article creation. I am trying to write an article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:National_Skill_Development_Corporation_NSDC & has been pending for a long time. I need assistance on how to improve the article & get it live on wikipedia.
 * } Hello, Omar.  Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.  Our apologies for the very great delay in response.  I've taken a look at your submission and I'm not convinced that a separate article on this corporation is appropriate.  All of your references are statements made by the government of India, so it doesn't appear that this public/private organization has been the subject of much independent coverage.  But this is to be expected of many organizations operated by government ministries.  In your case, the better approach will be to expand the listing for the NSDC that already appears in the brief article on the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship.  When presented within the Ministry's article, the lack of third-party coverage will not be a problem.  And discussion of the various organizations will improve the Ministry article, as well.  I hope this response has been helpful.  If this is the approach that you choose to take, please let me know and I'll be happy to assist you further.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Request on 11:28:38, 25 July 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by 86.170.6.71
Please advise what other references I need to cite in my article. Your help is much appreciated 86.170.6.71 (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

86.170.6.71 (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I left a comment on Draft:Leonard Walters. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:38, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

14:58:03, 25 July 2017 review of submission by BeaglePower
BeaglePower (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Defining Lewis acid or base strength and how to compare one acid or base to another is not simple. This Wikipedia piece is meant to show that there is a way to unambiguously define Lewis acid and base strengths. To understand the definition the need for two parameters (or properties) must be clearly demonstrated. This graphical approach clearly illustrates something that many students have trouble understanding.

I do not understand reason that the article: A Visual Definition of Lewis Acid and Base Strengths is not suitable topic for a Wikipedia article. BeaglePower (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

I have taught his approach for many years in an advanced college chemistry course and I, as well as others, have found it very helpful to students for learning the unambiguous definition of Lewis acid and Lewis base strengths. If a Wikipedia piece had been available when I first learned of this, it would have been very helpful to me as I prepared to teach this. We offered this visual definition in the hope that it would be useful to others trying to teach about acids and bases. BeaglePower (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, I think getting some assistance from WikiProject Chemistry is the best way to solve this issue. The regulars there are familiar with the styles and norms of writing about the subject on Wikipedia. I have posted a request for help there. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * There is already a WP page on the ECW Model. The draft article could be re-written to be a section of that article.  EdChem (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I have tagged the draft for merging. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * , I have posted to BeaglePower's user page because there have been additions and reversions. I did mean that a re-write was needed as the tone is not encyclopaedic.  Hopefully that will be helpful.  EdChem (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll leave this to you guys to sort, my chemistry education more or less ended in high school, over 30 years ago. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok,, but I think the real issue is whether the content is encyclopaedic. Hopefully BeaglePower read what I wrote and see the difference in tone and style.  It's not whether the content is accurate – the chemists like Smokefoot and me have to check that – but I would hope that any experienced Wikipedian can see and comment on the stylist and tonal issues with the draft as written.  I am sure that BeaglePower is frustrated to have additions reverted, but understanding what is and isn't appropriate text for Wikipedia would help greatly.  I don't want to have to sit and redraft it all.  EdChem (talk) 16:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

22:23:08, 25 July 2017 review of submission by Ahmedelkas
My draft was declined and i don't know what's the reason for that please help Ahmedelkas (talk) 22:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * NOTE: Response has been given on the Draft page. NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:36, 29 July 2017 (UTC)