Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 June 5

= June 5 =

02:51:26, 5 June 2017 review of submission by MicroPowerpoint
I want to know whether the article is alright at best and can be a real article or if I need to improve it further and how so. I pretty much want to know if the article needs trimming and if it passes WP:MUSICBIO. Micro (Talk) 02:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, the draft is in the queue to be reviewed, you will receive feedback in due course. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Request on 06:31:59, 5 June 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Narayanan, Ananth
I have added the references to the draft but unable to submit for evaluation. There is no submit button in the edit page

Narayanan, Ananth (talk) 06:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, Ananth. There was no "submit" button because you chose to delete all of the reviewers findings and comments.  I've restored them, and you'll find a "submit" button in the top-most decline box.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

11:12:37, 5 June 2017 review of submission by Abishe
Abishe (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Although I don't have much citations to this article,I wanted to create this article about popular Sri Lankan sportsperson.That's all.But I know that I won't get the permission to create this article.I will accept the views of every Wikipedians if they are not willing to give permit foe my draft.Thank You Abishe (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi . Thank you for your submission. Articles for Creation is severely backlogged, so it may take a month or so, but Draft:Ananda Wedisinghe will be reviewed in due course. While you are waiting, search the Sri Lanka motorsport press for any additional sources that would help demonstrate notability and flesh out the description of his career. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

23:16:39, 5 June 2017 review of submission by RLass
Hello! I am in the second review stage for the page Funner, California. I updated the page with all of the articles that surfaced May 19 in hopes that this page would be adequately supported. Is there any more details or knowledge that anyone can provide as to how to get this page approved? Or what stage is this second round of review at?

Thank you! RLass (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Reply - I think your references look pretty solid, however you may want to ensure you have removed any language that could be seen as promotional (such as when you say the business is committed to "fun"), and ensure all aspects of the page are sourced so that there is no content without proper referencing before resubmitting the draft for review. Isingness (talk) 00:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)