Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 May 26

= May 26 =

14:10:32, 26 May 2017 review of submission by Cogic2
Please help me understand what you were looking for. Also, I looked up several other articles on bishops, and noted that the primary information regarding them was regarding becoming bishops with a little else detailing their notability. Please give clarity as to why a Catholic bishop is considered notable for simply being a bishop but a COGIC Bishop would not be
 * User:Cogic2 - First, there is a problem with your username if (as it appears) COGIC is a church denomination, because your username appears to reflect the denomination. If your account is used only by one person, please change the name.  If it is used by more than one person, please don't; please change the name and choose one person to take over the account.  Second, the basic issue about notability of bishops is that the title Bishop is used very differently in different denominations.  In some churches, such as Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran, and Anglican, a bishop is the head of a usually large diocese consisting of a large number of churches.  In such churches, a bishop has extensive authority in a relatively large jurisdiction.  However, some denominations give the title of bishop to the senior pastor of a congregation, a less important role.  If the Church of God in Christ has large dioceses consisting of large numbers of churches, it would be useful to explain that in the draft.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * user:Robert McClenon Thank you for giving some clarity. Yes, Jurisdictional bishops in COGIC are the equivalent of diocean bishops in the Catholic church. They are responsible for large geographical areas the oversee the churches in those areas. The subject of this submission oversees churches in Nova Scotia, Canada, New York, Pennsylvania, and MA, having oversight of approximately 90 churches. While this may not be as large as some Catholic dioceses, the responsibilities and authority is comparable. Cogic2 22:29:44, 26 May 2017

20:37:53, 26 May 2017 review of submission by Ainullah khN
Ainullah khN (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, Ainullah. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.  Our apologies for the great delay in response.  Did you have a specific question?  NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

22:57:51, 26 May 2017 review of submission by Vasilii Tiorkin
Dear Wikipedia,

Thank you for accepting my first article called "Supersymmetric theory of stochastic dynamics". This article is about a theory that is also called "Supersymmetric theory of stochastics" and "Topological field theory of dynamical systems". My question is as follows. Should I create a "disambiguation page" with an alternative title and then redirect it to the original page or is there a more preferable way to deal with the problem of alternative names ?

Best regards, --I.

Vasilii Tiorkin (talk) 22:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Reply - Dear User:Vasilii Tiorkin, the method you are looking for is the creation of a Redirect page, where the alternative title can be searched, and directs you to the desired page. To create a redirect, simply follow the instructions here Redirect. Isingness (talk) 23:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)