Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 October 22

= October 22 =

09:05:16, 22 October 2017 review of submission by Amansaggu26
I created a wiki article for OmiseGo on 22nd Sept 2017. It still has not been approved. I have addressed all the comments and suggestions on the page. I also need to make changes and additions to the article, however I do not want it to get to the bottom of the queue again. Any advice would be appreciated. Nobody can access the page.

Amansaggu26 (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi . There is no danger of being put to the bottom of the queue. You can freely edit the draft for any reason it will not effect the time for review. It can take a long time as it is reviewed by general experienced Wikipedians. Lee Vilenski(talk) 10:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

10:44:56, 22 October 2017 review of submission by MilanSafex
MilanSafex (talk) 10:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello guys,

Thanks for your feedback regarding the article that I submitted. Can you tell me a detailed reason why it was declined, so I can edit what was not suitable for Wikipedia? I would do it immediately. I just don't know exactly what's wrong, and I'm not playing dumb, I just want to be a productive member of the community.

Thank you, Milan


 * Hi, looks like it was denied for being not written from a neutral POV, and possibly advertising. I'm not entirely sure it really reached notability either. Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

10:47:32, 22 October 2017 review of submission by Shams. auobi
we need to put all our company information on wikipedia for promotion of content Shams. auobi (talk) 10:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not the place for promotion or advertising Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:59, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

12:42:35, 22 October 2017 review of submission by Pep67
I'm a little disappointed as my article keeps being declined, I've added references from notable sources and still it's being declined can you give me clear pointers as to where you feel that these references aren't notable.

Pep67 (talk) 12:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi social media is not considered valid sources. Nor are primary sources. Links to music isn't a source to say why they are notible. You need to find sources that say things about the product online, which you can then talk about. Lee Vilenski(talk) 15:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

18:15:04, 22 October 2017 review of submission by Dipatuan-V
Dear Editors;

I have submitted my biography last 20 of October and it was already declined twice because it says that This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability

The editor was right since we forgot to publish the events on Newspapers or to any other reliable sources to publish the said event. What we have done only was the Souvenir Magazine which was distributed to the guests who attended the said events. Now I know how important it is and because of that experience, I could advise those who will do the same to publish it first for their future references that they could use as independent resources to support such claim.

What I did was that when we created our own website https://www.sultanateoflakungan.org/ I created a Blog/Current Events corner of our website to publish each of our Events such us: 1. 1st Mindanaw Sultanate Summit on Peace and Security attended by the Secretary of National Defense General Delfin Lorenzana and Former the AFP Chief of Staff General Hermogenes C. Esperon Last March 02-04 2017 in Davao City; 2. Celebrating the 10th Founding Anniversary of Sultanate of Rajah Buayan Sa Buayan, Darus-Salam held last December 2016; and 3. Dipatuan A Kanda - V Enthronement: Sultanate of Lakungan https://www.sultanateoflakungan.org/single-post/2016/11/30/Dipatuan-A-Kanda---V-Enthronement

This are all reliable blogs posted on our website and is consider authentic.

Thus, I am appeal to the honorable editors to kindly reconsider the blogs posted on our website that claims the notability to support such claim. I am referring to the self-Published resources to be used as Reference only for this Biography.

I am hoping for your kind-hearted consideration and warm-hearted approval on this matter.

I am hoping to hear your positive feedback coming from the editors soon.

Thank you to all of you.

Moh-Ali Duruin Nasa


 * Hello, Moh-Ali. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.  I think you are missing an essential element of our notability policy.  It is not enough to have sources that have been published (although that is indeed a basic requirement).  Those sources must be authoritative and must be independent of the subject.  You draft continues to be sourced only to the website of the sultanate, which is not independent of the subject.  You'll need to locate sources that are not related to the sultanate, but that still discuss the subject in some depth.  I hope this response has been helpful.  If you have any questions, feel free to ask.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

21:58:33, 22 October 2017 review of submission by Cbeck2017
Cbeck2017 (talk) 21:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC) How do you talk
 * Hi there, do you have a specific question about your AFC submission? KGirl  (Wanna chat?) 22:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)