Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 September 27

= September 27 =

03:21:21, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Ronald Carlson
Ronald Carlson (talk) 03:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you.

I object to the decision not to host DAB.

Some unknowleage individual says that this is inappropriate since is seems as tho DAB site is a running "how to" and ovserlooks the fact that DAP is a revolutionary new methodology.

There is nothing like DAB is the profession!

Look at you host "resing bonded bridges."

You should, based upon recent decision on DAB, take it down.

Why?

Resing Bonded bridges are nothing more than conventional bridges, a single iteration thereof.

You'll have to give our editor a better reason that that which was just offered.

I request a "editior's review" on someones unilateral "hack."

Thank you.

Editor SFC


 * Draft:DIRECT ADHESION BRIDGE--DAP cites no references. It lists some, but does not cite them. This will certainly cause it to be rejected.
 * Wikipedia has no article titled Resing bonded bridges. Maproom (talk) 21:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

09:16:51, 27 September 2017 review of submission by IKEW S.
Can I edit the title of the Wikipedia page that I have just created? IKEW S. (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It's called a page move and you'll find it under the 'more'-tab at the top of the page. be careful, though. It's not simply editing, it's giving the page a new title. Make sure you leave it in the "draft"-namespace untill the reviewers have looked at it. Kleuske (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

12:26:19, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Rachel Pleet at BrandTotal
There are two template messages on the wikipedia page that I created ("Dark Marketing") and I want to address them. The first message says that "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject" and that cleanup may be required. In a very neutral tone, I am writing about a phenomenon that exists in the marketing ecosystem. The company, BrandTotal, trademarked the term "Dark Marketing" which is why the company is mentioned and discussed briefly. How can I "clean the page up" while still being able to explain the origin of the term "Dark Marketing"? The second message on the wikipedia page says it contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help me understand what exactly I need to remove here to improve the grading of the whole article. Thank you!

Rachel Pleet at BrandTotal (talk) 12:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Rachel, this page is for articles currently in the Articles for Creation process. Dark_Marketing has been accepted and is now in article space. I suggest you post your question at Teahouse, where you can get advice from experienced editors. Voceditenore (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Request on 16:30:02, 27 September 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Viktor Paul
Hello, please let me know why the article regarding the draft Ralf Hildenbeutel was declined. It says "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". I have already made some changes and hope to be going in the right direction. Comparing to other articles about artists/musicians, it seems not not be so different anymore and more neutral now. Kindly let me know what I particularly need to change to improve the draft even more. Thanks very much and best regards.--Viktor Paul (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Viktor Paul (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi . The draft cites a single source, a program listing that merely confirms that Hildenbeutel played keyboards for Earth Nation at Montreux Jazz Live on 16 July 1994. Multiple, independent, reliable sources that cover Hildenbeutel at some depth are required in order to demonstrate that he is notable, in other words that there is a good reason an article about him should be included in Wikipedia.


 * Phrases like "best known", "most important", and "Ralf decided" cannot be stated in Wikipedia's voice. Sources that support these statements must be referenced, and attribution given in the text for opinions (e.g. According to so-and-so, ...) --Worldbruce (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

20:08:30, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Mathopo
How can I improve the use of the primary sources in the Tetrabrot article?

Thanks!

21:19:46, 27 September 2017 review of submission by 199.58.132.3
199.58.132.3 (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC) Lewis Michael Senior
 * Hello, Lewis. Did you have a specific question?  NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)