Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 August 15

= August 15 =

Request on 00:17:42, 15 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by TimKershawAFSA
Hello,

I would like to get some assistance on which parts of the article need to be improved to make it nuetral. Thank you for your time.

TimKershawAFSA (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Greetings. Please note that Wikipedia strongly discourage an editor who has conflict of interest to create/write/add content to an effected article as it is at times editor to might write article subjectively instead write the article in a neutral point of view in plain, factual manner. Pls disclosure you COI in the article talk page and your user page as per the message sent to you on your user talk page. Please write the comments in the panel boxes (click on the blue highlighted texts left on your talk page/the article page where your questions above would be answered. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 21:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

06:23:29, 15 August 2018 review of submission by Gowtham de
I can't understand the reason behind it.And also S.Ayyampalayam page is simply contains two or three lines olny.So pls tell me where to find reliable source is?? Gowtham de (talk) 06:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi . Is S.Ayyampalayam the same as Senjeri Ayyampalayam? If so, the Census of India would be one reliable source. With so little to say about the village, is there really any point to creating the article? Instead, why not improve Sulur, which needs much improvement. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Request on 13:58:33, 15 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by W.J. Gies
Our page keeps getting rejected. Every time we change it to suit one reviewer, another reviewer comes in and rejects it again. We are a small non-profit organization with a large internal body of literature but not much written about us outside of the organization. We patterned our page off of our sister organization, the International College of Dentists, which has exactly 0 references. We understand there are some word choices we can change, and we're happy to do so, but the demands being made for lengthy external citations seem arbitrary and is a one size fits all approach that doesn't work for small organizations like the American College of Dentists. Please look at the International College of Dentists and point out the significant differences between our entries. Is there a way to discuss this over the phone? Thank you. W.J. Gies (talk) 13:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Let's break this down in a couple of parts.


 * First, to whom are you referring when you say "our page"? Are you saying that you are affiliated with the page's subject? If so, have you appropriately disclosed the conflict of interest? Additionally, are you receiving any form of compensation for your edits to Wikipedia? If so, you must disclose that status.


 * To the article itself, it seems to me that DGG's comments when they declined the submission are pretty clear. The article does read like something one would find on the organization's website and it should be rewritten so that it doesn't sound like an advertisement. DGG also made several other specific suggestions that I'm not sure have been fully addressed. Striker force Talk 14:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

20:31:38, 15 August 2018 review of submission by Gogdf
Gogdf (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

20:31:38, 15 August 2018 review of submission by Gogdf

I would like to understand why my page couldn't be made in greater detail. Genesis Development Foundation user: gogdf
 * You haven't specified a Draft in progress, but I will offer an educated guess that you may be facing issues regarding conflict of interest and or paid editing disclosure, based on your user name. I interpret "gogdf" to perhaps be your initials + Genesis Development Foundation. Striker force Talk 20:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)