Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 17

= December 17 =

03:22:43, 17 December 2018 review of draft by Luther Aragones
Luther Aragones (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I am writing to talk about this article that I have been creating for several months ... Mundo De Cristo. I understand that at the beginning I did not have all the references I needed, but over time, I added more, in total we have 16 references placed and I still can not understand why it does not meet the necessary references to be in Wikipedia.

On the other hand, I am the creator and director of this medium, all the information I have used in it, are totally real. Another point is that the last time we sent the application, several days later they put in a token, which is still ... saying the following: "An important contributor to this article seems to have a close connection with his subject." to this file, I was answering in the discussion section, requesting help and at the same time information to get to put our article on the platform. In addition to this we could see that the article, that person who is said to be an important contributor, improved certain information, and therefore I came to think that it would be available.

Concluding I just need to know what other information is missing from my article to be available and if I can have help from you to put it. I would appreciate it enough, I have tried it in different ways.

Thank you very much and I hope for your help. Luther Aragones (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

06:29:14, 17 December 2018 review of submission by NELSON VIJAY05
NELSON VIJAY05 (talk) 06:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

07:12:21, 17 December 2018 review of submission by Amekh
Hello, I built upon the list I submitted initially with 6 additional websites and 3 additional descriptors. Please provide advice on how I can improve the content further to get approval on wikipedia. The goal is to provide a list of data analysis tools for League of Legends players. Thank you. Amekh (talk) 07:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

09:58:45, 17 December 2018 review of draft by Kisscsi
{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Could you please specify what's wrong with this article? It was written neutral pont of view, contains facts and lot's of sources. Hungarian version is already submitted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MET_Group

Kisscsi (talk) 09:58, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

10:53:58, 17 December 2018 review of submission by MaciekKubiak
MaciekKubiak (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Request on 13:20:02, 17 December 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 69.157.202.50
Hi,

My draft was rejected due to: "Draft lacks independent reliable source references." I have sited a Canadian government website as a reference which includes a description of the organisation and a link to the organisations website. I am confused as to how much more reliable a reference you are wanting. why is this not enough? Thanks,

69.157.202.50 (talk) 13:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * One of the standards used to demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia) of charitable organizations is, "The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization." Citing one government webpage, which appears to contain information supplied by the organization, proves the organization exists. It comes nowhere near demonstrating significant coverage from a variety of independent reliable sources over a period of time. See Seacology as an example of the breadth of information and sources Wikipedia is seeking for a charity. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

15:18:35, 17 December 2018 review of draft by IAmTheNeil
Hi team,

I would greatly appreciate some additional advice on the creation of the DaVinci Resolve article, and ensuring it meets Wikipedia's quality standards.

I strongly feel that this software deserves its own article, given that:
 * It often used in conjunction with various applications which have their own articles (e.g. Media Composer, Adobe Premiere Pro) in the workflows of professional filmmakers.
 * Similar applications have their own articles (e.g. Nuke (software)).
 * Its current primary entry redirects to a company that hasn't owned the software since 2009.
 * Applications that are integrated directly into it as modules (e.g. Blackmagic_Fusion) have dedicated articles for their standalone versions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IAmTheNeil (talk • contribs) 16:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It is one of the industry-leading products for its field.

I have included multiple articles from established third-party publications to establish notability (a valid concern raised during the first submission); however, despite attempts to maintain a neutral tone, the remaining concerns are that it's too promotional.

Please advise what steps can be taken to increase the level of neutrality of the article to an acceptable level, without removing the articles which demonstrate its notability. I have already made the list of films & TV more concise, in response to concerns over coatrack creation.

Thank you.

IAmTheNeil (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

20:56:59, 17 December 2018 review of draft by Tyler Durd
I need help for creating new sections for the filmography of the company REAL by FAKE which the company wiki page draft is pending review. I want to create something similar to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNEG

Tyler Durd (talk) 20:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Welcome to Article for Creation help desk.  Please read  Your first article to familiar yourself what is needed to create an article. Once you have done that then go to  Article_wizard - Here] and start drafting. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)