Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 26

= December 26 =

10:34:13, 26 December 2018 review of submission by Naitsabes117
Hi, I'm requesting a Re-Review, because the reviewer who rejected it just wasn't sure, if it's relevant for Wikipedia. And when one isn't sure, a second opinion is the best solution. There was no problem to publish it in German Wikipedia and the text is all right, as I've been told. I really would appreciate a re-review. Thank you! Naitsabes117 (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

16:04:23, 26 December 2018 review of submission by Solkut
How can I make this notable? Debug Teddy Bear is well known in hi-tech in Israel.

Solkut (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Greeting to you and welom to AfC help desk. Kindly visit Your first article for your above question.Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

17:14:16, 26 December 2018 review of submission by Dcharchour
Hello -- I wanted to ask for advice on this article. I've been reviewing WP:THREE and WP:Notability and have tried to edit the content accordingly to meet these guidelines. I was hoping to get more focused feedback and better understand next steps (if applicable) to moving forward with this draft. Thank you again! Dcharchour (talk) 17:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Greetings to you and welcome to Article for Creation help desk. Thank you for declaring your WP:PAID (self/freelancer on behalf of WorkMarket) on your user page ; however, if you are paid to create  Draft:Jeff Wald then you need to declare it on your user page as well as on the article talk page here. Pls note all 3 sources you provided are considered not independent and reliable as they are either interview pieces or marketing/promotion piece by not reliable source.  For a subject to merit a page in Wikipedia (1) the subject need to pass the notability guidelines. (2) the contain claimed need to support by significant coverage (at least 3 independent reliable sources) independent, reliable where by the sources talk about the subject in length and in dept and not merely passing mentioned. Independent and reliable sources are sources which the content have gone through reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy such as from major newspaper/ reputable journals / books. (3) the content of the article need to be written neutral point of view (NPOV); what I see at present the article is slight off from being NPOV (example -  "most influential people in the .." "has quickly become a leading on-demand marketplace for freelancers..") - just provide fact and plain written would help.). Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)