Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 7

= December 7 =

00:49:13, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Nyc snow bus
I read the article concerning notability. it is not clear why this article is not notable. its a business that over 100,000 people take, and is one of the top 3 providers in NYC. Nyc snow bus (talk) 00:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

01:21:47, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Ilovebirthdays
Ilovebirthdays (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

01:21:47, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Ilovebirthdays

Can you please explain the reason why the draft was not approved?

Thx!!

Ilovebirthdays (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

01:35:10, 7 December 2018 review of draft by Ebrebelmusic
Ebrebelmusic (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

All of the sources I have provided are independent of the subject of the page. I am not sure which in particular is causing the denial.

Please review again.


 * Hi . You could resubmit the draft, but it would simply be declined again. Referencing rawartists, centraltrack, and afropunk does not help. Throw away all three. Look for non-interview significant coverage in any three of the reliable sources listed at WikiProject Albums/Sources. If such coverage is not found, then the topic is not suitable for Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

01:52:26, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Ilovebirthdays
Ilovebirthdays (talk) 01:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

I have added a few sources after reading your comments. How can I resubmit the article?

Thanks!!

02:15:27, 7 December 2018 review of submission by PoonamVRajput
PoonamVRajput (talk) 02:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

03:58:04, 7 December 2018 review of submission by MichelangeloT
MichelangeloT (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, just would like to understand why the post was denied? I know there isn't as much information as some major record producers articles yet but I feel there is enough information under "Mekazazzo" to be considered valuable so far being associated with Outlawz and Savemoney's Kami de Chukwu and Monster Mike.

Please fill me in, Thank you!

Michel Vaughan


 * , Hi, it was rejected because the sources weren't anywhere near satisfying WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST and don't show significance in any coverage online. JC7V (talk) 05:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

04:57:40, 7 December 2018 review of draft by Carlobulletinph
How do I check if the Draft article I made was already submitted for review? Thank you. Carlobulletinph (talk) 04:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It was not submitted but the subject is not suitable as fails WP:NPOL Legacypac (talk) 05:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

05:25:46, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Ruchika Daga
My page was not accepted even though the person talked about in the page/draft is a celebrity and India's first lingerie designer. Ruchika Daga (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * , It's not about being a celebrity, Wikipedia topics should be notable per WP:GNG and similar guidelines (the WP:N ones). Her draft is way too promotional with a lot of buzzwords which even if the sources were enough, it still wouldn't be accepted due to being promotional. Sources should be from newspapers, books ,magazines independent of her and more than in passing (see WP:IRS). JC7V (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

09:33:27, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Lordofthefloor
Hello, I have updated the article initially rejected even more now. Would really appreciate if you could have another look. And please help me out if there is still anything that seems wrong. Lordofthefloor (talk) 09:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

09:43:26, 7 December 2018 review of draft by Nicholas Eastop - Scenkonstmuseet
Hello! I'm asking for help with a draft article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jens_Bj%C3%B8rn-Larsen I'm perplexed that an individual I feel to be highly notworthy and deserving of documentation is rejected as "not notworthy". Mr. Björn Larsen is possibly the most famous tubist in the world - merely winning the Geneva competition (a staggering achievement) puts him in the top rank of international musicians let alone tubists... He is a member of (according to the BBC) "the best chamber orchestra in the world", The Chamber Orchestra of Europe. He has recorded a number of solo CDs, of which I've only listed one so far, and teaches at two extremely respected conservatories. I am deeply saddened that the wikipedia editors consider him unnoteworthy and can only put it down to a narrow world view and lack of understanding of the milieu of classical music. I assume in there view that there is nothing a mere tubist, not even the best in the world, can do to become notworthy - it is simply not possible?

Nicholas Eastop - Scenkonstmuseet (talk) 09:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Not exactly, – we do have articles (though not necessarily very good ones) on most of the best-known tuba players: Roger Bobo, Carol Jantsch, Harvey Phillips, Øystein Baadsvik, Howard Johnson, for example. What you need to do for Jens Bjørn-Larsen is to show that he is notable by the standards of Wikipedia, by finding independent reliable sources which cover his achievements and abilities in depth; as far as I can see, there is not one of those in your draft. The sources must support the text: you say, for example, that Bjørn-Larsen won the Concours de Genève in 1991, but his name is not present on the page you link to, or indeed (apparently) anywhere on that website; searching laureates for 1991 + tuba gets one hit, Øystein Baadsvik (that could be the fault of the website). I note that – unlike Phillips, Bobo, Johnson and a good number of other tuba players, Bjørn-Larsen does not have an article in Grove – but then neither does Jantsch or Baadsvik. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply Justlettersandnumbers (talk) I added a link to the wikipedia page listing the winners of the Geneva competition, is this acceptable? One has to search the Geneva competition's own website, I do not know how to link to a search or search result - I too searched https://www.concoursgeneve.ch/section/laureates/search_laureates/ and found JBL straight away as the 1991 winner. Baadsvik came second. Baadsvik has a lot of links to CD's, would a more complete list of JBL's recordings be sufficient to indicate noteworthiness? Would you not say his collaboration with manufacturers B&S on an instrument that bears his name is an indication of his noteworthiness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas Eastop - Scenkonstmuseet (talk • contribs) 15:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

12:39:41, 7 December 2018 review of draft by Leonardoamico
Dear Wikipedia team, I hope you are fine. I feel lost, because it seems that the page I wrote is wrong. I put more than 42 references (reliable references). Could you help me ? Hope not to disturb you too much.$$ Sincerely yours.

Leonardoamico (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi - From the responses the reviewers have given you, it looks as though they are not only worried about the references, but also the layout. You need to remove all external links in the body of the text. The article seems to just go into details about his hobbies, and such, and is very promotional. Wikipedia articles (specifically Biographies) need to be written from a neutral perspective.


 * Wikipedia's inclusion criteria is very specific about how subjects are deemed notable, and that is that independent reliable source talk about the subject in depth, and not just a list of sources talking about where the subject has worked.


 * I hope this is helpful, please ping me if you need more information.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

12:45:26, 7 December 2018 review of draft by Darshana1818
Darshana1818 (talk) 12:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

ESDS Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. is actually a renowned and one of the leading data centers and managed service providers in India. It has received US and UK Patents (numbers mentioned in the draft) for the eNlight cloud’s vertical scaling technology and its Wikipedia page is also there as earlier referenced in this new draft. Okay, I got to know that another Wikipedia article's reference is not valid so I have removed that but, the other link references given are from reliable sources as observed in other published articles. I have seen the pages of Ctrl S, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft’s Azure too and took cues from that. I’m really not able to figure out what is lacking. Kindly explain in detail.


 * Will deal with comments on the draft Legacypac (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

17:08:12, 7 December 2018 review of submission by VinceWakeman76
Hi There I am a little confused why this was declined, it's taken a while for me to get back to this due to other committments. I have based writing this article from looking at another page for Carl Reader. It has the same type of links and text. Do I need to include links to where Warren is mentioned but he hasn't written the Article?

Can you give me some specific ideas as to what I need to do to improve this and get it accepted.

Regards, Vince VinceWakeman76 (talk) 17:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Zeraoulia Rafik
Zeraoulia Rafik is a researcher in Mathematics, He was Born in 05/11/1985 at yabous , Khenchela , County Algeria  He have got him Bac in 2005 and he  studied in University Batna, He is actually Master PDE In university of Batna, i'm actually a teacher in high school , Timgad , Batna, Algeria .My interesting researchs are : number theory and Functional analysis and Also special function



Contribution to Mathematics
A new special function and its application in probability see

Solutions to some problems in international journal k.s see

Posting questions and Answers in stackexchange math

Posting questions and answers in Mathoverflow .com see

Researchgate

Group for mathematical research in Facebook



External link

 * []

2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season article
I Know That Tomorrow is the last day of the 2018 College Football Regular season. But when will the 2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season article start I Think it will start Tomorrow if I'm not mistaking. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Quite frankly you seem to be the only person here who is in such a hurry, so its up to you to create the article. See WP:YFA for guidance. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

I created the 2019 NCAA Division I FBS Article and it has one reference and the templates need to change from red to blue. Because the 2018 NCAA Division I FBS football regular season has just now ended. you need to start the 2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season article right now. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 23:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

22:40:14, 7 December 2018 review of submission by Maxlysle
This article describes a concept called a "smart token" introduced in the bancor whitepaper. However, it is written in a platform-agnostic way, only using the word "bancor" when citing a particular implementation as an example (such as in the formulas for price calculation). It was removed with a comment that it is "more cryptospam." It was not explained how the article is in violation of wikipedia's general sanctions. The general sanctions do not give carte blanch ability to scrub all crypto topics. I believe the article was removed unfairly by a biased editor. Maxlysle (talk) 22:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Maxlysle - The draft has not yet been deleted, only declined and proposed for speedy deletion as spam. You may challenge the deletion of the draft on the draft talk page.  This is not the preferred venue to challenge that deletion, because it may already be deleted before the deleting administrator reads this page.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2018 (UTC)