Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 July 15

= July 15 =

00:51:04, 15 July 2018 review of submission by Hawaza91
i need help writing this. Hawaza91 (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi . You are doing OK with the mechanics of creating a list. Wikipedia already has List of bridges in the United States and Category:Bridges in Cumberland County, Maine, so you might reach out to WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels or the less active WikiProject Maine to see if Draft:List of bridges in Portland, Maine is really needed, or if there are better ways for you to help improve the encyclopedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

03:52:13, 15 July 2018 review of submission by Raunac hunter
Raunac hunter (talk) 03:52, 15 July 2018 (UTC) what should i do?
 * Hi . Draft:Raunac hunter was declined because you skipped several key steps in successful article creation and leapt straight into writing. Your first article explains the importance of gathering reliable sources, making sure your topic belongs in an encyclopedia (is "notable", your topic probably isn't), and gaining experience by editing existing articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 05:35:07, 15 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Nichko.bacani
Nichko.bacani (talk) 05:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * - Hi - you've submitted the same "query" three times so I've removed two of them. But I'm still not sure what the query is? The draft you submitted looked like a test, it's just a string of random letters? KJP1 (talk) 07:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It looks like a password or a cryptocurrency adress. His userpage states pass so I suppose it is a password. -- &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  11:50, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * - Many thanks. But I still don't understand why he thinks it's a suitable draft?! KJP1 (talk) 11:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

19:18:00, 15 July 2018 review of submission by Cu.wang
Thanks a lot for the very quick reviewing. This is my first English language trial, I spent hours and hours reading and trying. I'm afraid my research Chinese citations, and English ones too, I've gathered for the drafting of Tan Zhonglin probably couldn't be read and verified completely by the reviewer in such a short time because they're not popular articles easily visible. Would you please take some time to read the sources and verify if you really need before you make a quick rejection? Also my status of research librarian and research fellow at an Ivy League University, with many Chinese and English publications, may qualify me in writing and publishing the entry on Tan Zhonglin. Also, please compare mine with Tan entries in Chinese and Japanese to see whether mine is qualified, richer one or not. In any case, I think this entry is a good contribution. Thank you very much.

Cu.wang (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✔️ Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:15, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

19:23:11, 15 July 2018 review of submission by Muukifar
Hi there, could you please give some feedback on this article? Is it acceptable and are there any specific points that could be improved? Thanks!Muukifar (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Muukifar (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

15 July 2018 review of submission by Muukifar
I'm not sure neologism, but is my change ok? to solve neologism. 49.148.250.192 (talk) 22:34, 15 July 2018 (UTC)