Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 July 2

= July 2 =

04:14:43, 2 July 2018 review of submission by 50.26.7.208
50.26.7.208 (talk) 04:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Some dick named David.Moreno is picking apart my article for Jana Barros. Can someone please red flag him and green light the article. He declined it because he says she's not notable as a musician. He obviously didn't read the article or he would know she started doing music a few years ago and is notable as an actress for her work in national film and modeling runway work.


 * Hi, No personal attack on editor in Wikipedia for you may be blocked.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:06, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

10:00:31, 2 July 2018 review of submission by Naqvi syed512
Naqvi syed512 (talk) 10:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Why my Article submission decline
 * Hi . It was explained on your talk page and in the red box at the top of the draft itself. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

17:28:42, 2 July 2018 review of submission by Svetlana Mikhaylova
We are a very matured company, existing since 2011. I created a wikipedia article about the company - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UBANK i really cannot understand why we don't deserve a non-biased (just facts) wikipedia article. A huge amount of companies that are much much smaller have wikipedia articles. Please help me.

Svetlana Mikhaylova (talk) 17:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Please do not write about your own company. This is an encyclopaedia, not a social media site, and I'm sure you can appreciate that our readers would have little trust in us if we allowed people to write about themselves or their employers. If UBANK is notable, a volunteer will create an article about it in time.
 * You will also need to read and conform to our paid editing policy, or you will be blocked. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

18:09:03, 2 July 2018 review of submission by Sergeismart
Thank you for your revision, I received a reply which stated that my Draft:King Richard I Of England - Richard The Lionheart was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia". I was offered to improve already existing article "Richard I of England" instead.

You see, I still would like to ask you to allow to Wikipedia my presentation as a separate article for the following reasons: 1. The existing article in question already presents the material in a very detailed way, my presentation contains basically the same material but in a much, much shorter and concise way which would (in my opinion) make it much more enjoyable for the readers to read and grasp all the necessary information. 2. The existing article in question contains plenty of effigies of King Richard made already after his death, I don't want to have any of it in my article. 3. The references to the possible homosexuality of King Richard in the existing article in question, I find unacceptable and don't want to have it anywhere near in my article. 4. In the second paragraph of my article I cite not only Richard's poetry but also verses from the Psalms of David. The idea is to let the readers possibly understand how Richard might have perceived his own life through the perception of someone with more or less the same status (i.e. King David): both were considered men of God by their environment, but David left us his Psalms but King Richard didn't(though living 2000 years later). So I thought citing extracts from Psalms would help the readers somewhat in that respect, plus a lot of pictures all together in one place (and not scattered across the page) would help too.

That is why I feel my presantation should be a separate article. I also feel it should be fully protected (not that I expect any vandalism or like) but because I feel any possible future changes from the other sources won't be a contribution due to the stated nature of this particular presantation. That is why I am asking you to allow my presentation as a separate article and, if possible, make it fully-protected for the stated reasons. And I thank you in advance. Sergeismart (talk) 18:09, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi . Wikipedia is a collaborative project and we only have one article on each subject. You are welcome to make improvements to Richard I of England, but we don't allow editors to maintain their own "versions" of articles, nor do we protect pages unless it is absolutely necessary to prevent disruption (and then generally only temporarily). There are no exceptions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

19:05:13, 2 July 2018 review of submission by 157.157.65.57
I have no idea why DataMelt is not included in wikipedia (other public wikis have it). What else should be done with this article?

157.157.65.57 (talk) 19:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

19:40:40, 2 July 2018 review of submission by JohnnyBravo1221
Hello, I am new to Wikipedia. I came across this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dr_Fixit and another user has declined it saying article already exists in Wikipedia. I did some research to know that both are different brands and this brand(Dr. Fixit) is actually a child brand of the Parent brand (Pidilite Industries). Also, I was wondering in what ways can this article be improved so that it doesn't get rejected again. Thank you. JohnnyBravo1221 (talk) 19:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, including the original editor AzorAhaiy here. Dr. Fixit is one of the adhesive brands of Pidilite Industries. Presently, Dr. Fixit has been redirect to Pidilite Industries. The sources provided are primary sources (marketing piece, home page, announcements]] besides the source from businessline and it is not enough to establish organisation notability requirements needed by Wikipedia. To be a stand alone article the subject needs significant coverage from WP:independent reliable sources such as from major newspaper pr reputable magazines or independent professional review talk about the subject in dept.
 * Pidilite Industries is a sub class page and I recommend to expand the page by adding the Dr.Fixit's content onto that page. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)