Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 July 25

= July 25 =

04:40:24, 25 July 2018 review of submission by LaWr123
LaWr123 (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello!

My article on the McClure Twins has been awaiting review for 6 weeks. Is it possible to expedite the process? Please advise.

Looking forward to hearing from you!

Best, LaWr123 (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

06:28:45, 25 July 2018 review of submission by 2405:205:208F:8C22:882E:CBA0:6800:ABA8
I want you to potentially delete the article 2405:205:208F:8C22:882E:CBA0:6800:ABA8 (talk) 06:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagged for deletion as requested. KJP1 (talk) 06:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

08:26:49, 25 July 2018 review of submission by Wayfarer1234567
I have put together a draft for my brand (After listing that I am paid editor) and the link to my brand draft is given below. I consulted a few admins on live chat who told me that my sources are notable, however I wanted to cross check here. Here are some more sources that I'd like to check on, and I'd be extremely grateful if you could tell me if these sources work too, for my article.

http://www.ecuavisa.com/articulo/noticias/internacionales/75054-cuantos-millones-se-mueven-detras-chats-eroticos-linea

https://jezebel.com/cam-girls-are-making-absolute-bank-1617137218

http://www.blikk.hu/sztarvilag/sztarsztorik/titkairol-vallott-a-magyar-milliardos-gattyan-gyorgy/kt0slmk

http://theconversation.com/webcamming-the-sex-work-revolution-that-no-one-is-willing-to-talk-about-69834

https://jezebel.com/cam-girls-reveal-their-clients-most-bizarre-sexual-requ-1614236300

https://www.ft.com/content/7bce6750-1408-11e5-9bc5-00144feabdc0

https://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/23/porn-becomes-less-seedy-but-not-quite-mainstream.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/23/porn-becomes-less-seedy-but-not-quite-mainstream.html

https://www.ft.com/content/7bce6750-1408-11e5-9bc5-00144feabdc0

Wayfarer1234567 (talk) 08:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Sadly, I don't have enough time to look at your references, but I did notice that your article is at Draft:Jasmin. I have moved this to Draft:Jasmin (website), as there are lots of articles under Jasmin.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I took a brief look through these links. Some I couldn't read because of paywalls or other barriers. You are looking for notability references. Therefore, you should not be submitting for consideration links that contain a) interviews with company officers, or b) only brief side-mentions of Jasmin along the way of discussing camgirls. Also, your first link should prefer to point to the DailyMail article it is apparently a translation of.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 08:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

08:39:11, 25 July 2018 review of submission by Nadav23
Nadav23 (talk) 08:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

09:20:09, 25 July 2018 review of submission by Mr suhane
Mr suhane (talk) 09:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

There is no relevant Excuse to decline my Article as i working as a writer in Website and my published articles reading by the verified page or person, then why i did not publish my article ; regarding my work ?

Very Disappointing !


 * - Autobiographies, or works written about a subject you work closely with (As you are clearly writing about yourself) is highly discouraged on Wikipedia. First, you will need to Disclose your conflict of interest as you are also writing about yourself.


 * You are probably not notable enough to meet Wikipedias guidelines for inclusion. And, unless the subject meets the requirements, no article will be liable to be created. You need to provide reliable independent sources that speak in-depth about the subject, not simply links to your instagram and facebook. Without being able to read the other two sources that you have linked, I can't comment on the reliability of them.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Deleted per G11 as being blatant self promotion. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

12:25:53, 25 July 2018 review of draft by Chip.berlet
OK, I admit I am an old fart, so I used to just create or expand articles and then add in the cites I had collected. OK, so tighter rules enforcement. So what is the proper way at the top of a new page that signifies it is a "Draft" that may take a day or two to build up with text and cites to a point where it may be a "Stub" but not sent down the garbage chute before I have finished editing a fully cited and splendiferous page? I did true to find instructions, but just could not. Thanks

Chip.berlet (talk) 12:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Greetings. Draft page will store in Wikipedia for 6 months before it will be deleted, thus, you have six months to work on the draft page. Secondly, at least 3 sources needed which the sources should be independent, reliable and  secondly where by the subject is talked about in length and dept and not merely passing mentioned. Please also read WP:Your First Article and referencing for biginners] to familiar yourself on how to write an article and citing in Wikipedia. Once you have insert the inline citations then please click submit for review.  To say all that, if the subject is formerly know as [[World Congress of Families then this page should not be created but any additional info could be added into World Congress of Families. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

16:27:12, 25 July 2018 review of submission by Annikash
I don't know how to make my page available so that the public can see it and I'm worried I just went to all that work to create it for nothing? Thanks! Annikash (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi . The draft is in the pool of submissions, and you can reasonably expect it to be reviewed within the next six weeks. On one hand, most submissions about extant companies are work "for nothing" because most businesses are not notable and drafts about them will never be accepted. See WP:BFAQ for more information. On the other hand, I'm sure you've learned something in the course of writing the draft, so in that sense it hasn't been "for nothing". If you're interested in more productive ways to improve the encyclopedia, see Community portal for how to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

19:23:19, 25 July 2018 review of draft by Alanelpaso123
How do I get this page published and linked to the Motels' discography page? Alanelpaso123 (talk) 19:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi . If you believe it meets WP:NALBUM, then when you are ready for it to be reviewed, click the gray "Submit your draft for review!" button inside the large gray box at the top of the draft. If, when it is reviewed, it is accepted, then you can link to it from The Motels discography. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:16, 26 July 2018 (UTC)