Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 July 5

= July 5 =

06:34:26, 5 July 2018 review of submission by Bannermichael5
Hi. I submitted an article for review a while back but it got declined due to notability. I've updated the links and the content of the draft. I just want to check if it's good to go now. Draft:Gamezop Issue: Notability Bannermichael5 (talk) 06:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Draft:Gamezop is in the pool to be reviewed. Crunchbase, Live Mint, and The Economic Times fall into the "standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage" category of trivial coverage that doesn't demonstrate notability. The company is beginning to look like it's in "no amount of editing" territory. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 10:28:01, 5 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Pastor Castro
Pastor Castro (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

11:02:12, 5 July 2018 review of submission by Pastor Castro
Pastor Castro (talk) 11:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Please I need help with my publishing my letter Thank you
 * I'm afraid that, like many others, you have misunderstood what Wikipedia is about. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that summarizes what independent sources say about a subject. It is not a venue for publishing your original thoughts/letter. Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

13:09:51, 5 July 2018 review of submission by 1Tomcat2
I have just begun to write some stuff for Wikipedia and to begin with I am trying to do a small article on a Danish designer. It is now under review, but I can see some red text highligthing saying:

External link in |website= (help)

When I press 'help' I get an explanation I don't understand. What is wrong? And how do I correct it?

1Tomcat2 (talk) 13:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks like a user has already solved this issue on the draft. However, the "website" field in references is specifically, to denote what website gave the information, (rather than a link to the webiste). As these were written as "https://www.website.com", it produced an error. If this happens again, use the www.website.com.


 * If you are linking the reference to a particular place on the web, use the "url=" field, for this (This can have the https://.)  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:22, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

16:01:14, 5 July 2018 review of submission by Luckydrive
Luckydrive (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Hello, I have created an article on Strategic Coaching and I got an answer that this topic is already covered in Coaching. However the material is completely different and it focuses on the combination of strategy and coaching. Could you review the page I have created please and tell me what to do? Should I input it in Coaching as suggested? Or do anything else? Thnx in advance.


 * Note: User page has been deleted under WP:soapbox. Draft:Strategic Coaching was deleted under G11 (advertising/promotion.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

21:45:41, 5 July 2018 review of submission by Pmuehlen
Pmuehlen (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

In the article, Draft:Bernis_von_zur_Muehlen, several issues have been raised that I have difficulty responding to. They are:


 * (1) "Almost all of the biographical detail is unsourced. That violates WP:V as well as WP:BLP -
 * Reply : Please read independent, reliable source needed
 * (2) There is a major section in the page that is generally about male nudes in art. That section contains WP:OR essay writing, and only one sentence in it, is actually about her. It is altogether WP:OFFTOPIC/WP:COATRACK.
 * Reply: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not an essay. Sources provided needs to talk in dept of the subject and not mere passing mention. Coatrack article that ostensibly discusses its nominal subject. Articles in Wikipedia are summary of independent reliable source and written in neutral point of view in factual, plain fashion]]|undefined
 * (3) The bulk of the page is an artist CV, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTCV. M0uch of the listings of exhibits etc are unsourced or primary sourced
 * Independent secondary sources are needed here such as sources from major newspaper). CV, home page, FB, interviews and etc are consider primary sources and can NOT used to demonstrator subject notability
 * (4) Overall this page is very typical of conflict of interest editing.
 * Reply: conflict of interest. Authors have conflict of interest in affiliation with subject either friends/associates/family members or paid conflict of interest. see WP:COI


 * Reply:Pls read WP:Your First Article to familiar yourself on how to write an article in Wikipedia. The article needs rewrite. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)