Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 June 15

= June 15 =

01:58:37, 15 June 2018 review of submission by Cjwing
I need help publishing my article. I'm very new to wikipedia. I would love some help on how I can get my article published and approved when submitted for review. Cjwing (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Welcome to AfD help desk. The article has a number of issues and please see below:


 * 1) Subject does not meet Wikipedia musician/DJ notability requirements - Please see WP:MUSICBIO
 * 2) Content claimed needs to be supported by independent, reliable source (such as from major newspaper and journals) - pls see WP:RS
 * 3) Content added needs to be written in a neutral point of view - pls see WP:NPOV
 * Please not no amount of editing and sourcing, if the subject is not notable, it will not accepted by Wikipedia.  Let me know if anything else I would help. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

07:52:33, 15 June 2018 review of submission by Piero Caracciolo
I would like to have more specific explanations of the reasons for rejecting the article I submitted.

Whom and how should I ask that? I presume I should ask the person who reviewed it, that is Shadowol. Do I use for this purpose his talk page?

Or should I ask my questions here?

Tahnk you,

Piero Caracciolo (talk) 07:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Greetings to you and thank you for the question above. You could contact the reviewer or you could seek assistance here. Either options are appropriate. I have read the draft article briefly and have to say, it is rare to see a lengthy draft article written in such elegant prose. I can see you put a lot of work in it.
 * The reason that the draft copy is rejected because it did not written in neutral point of view but more of promoting the subject with subtle WP:PEACOCK prose. When an article is read like a advertisement, it means it is written by using puff up words/phrases to appeal to reader's emotions of the important and uniqueness of the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, for such the content should be written in a rather dull and plain prose with attribution to facts where info is gathered from secondary sources. Btw, do rework on the lead / introduction section - pls see MOS:LEAD for more info. Do drop by if you have further questions. Thank you and happy editing.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

21:27:01, 15 June 2018 review of submission by Parippuvada
Parippuvada (talk) 21:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * References are not good. Draft declined. Legacypac (talk) 06:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)