Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 June 26

= June 26 =

04:31:22, 26 June 2018 review of submission by Vannacharal
My Draft page getting Mithun Rajakumar rejected even though i have given proof and reliable reference..I need help to get approval of the draft page Vannacharal (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Greetings. The comments have given on the pink boxes on the draft page. The subject has yet to demonstrate the notability as the sources do not support it. Significant coverage from independent reliable sources (secondary source) are need where by the content is written about subject are "directly" and not merely passing mentioned.
 * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com - Kaala movie reciew - is about the movie and not the subject
 * You tube - You tube are primary source.
 * Wikipedia - Wikipedia can not be the source -s see WP:CIRCULAR.
 * http://tamil.thehindu.com/cinema/tamil-cinema/ - is an interview piece - a primary source
 * IMBD - User generated source (primary)
 * www.deccanchronicle.com (The TAmil Nadu you have not seen) - article is not about the subject

Pls see actor notability requirements from Wikipedia and see Here, title "Request on 15:31:34, 22 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by SazidKabir", on what is needed for a page to be accepted on notability, types of sources, significant coverage, verification requirements. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Please refer the following Mithun Rajakumar interview published in "The Hindu" page, ..it is written in Tamil, Tamil is one of the longest-surviving classical languages in the world.,Please transalte it to English and read. it clearly.it says everything about the person.DO you need more proof than this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannacharal (talk • contribs) 06:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * , Hi, please re-read the message above. Interview is considered primary source. Source need to be secondary and independent from subject - no utube, IMBD, facebook, any user generated content, interviews, home sites. Please see and read the source link above I had provided.Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

04:33:23, 26 June 2018 review of submission by AkshayChhibber
I would like to ask the help desk as to why precisely my article was rejected for the submission. Seems that all the valid information about the article was provided along with the references. The references provided are the only ones I have and can also be verified since these are the awards and recognitions won by uCertify. Apart from the 1 reference provided is from PRWeb which is again an online press release. Please explain in detail as to how this article can be edited in order to get it accepted for the submission. AkshayChhibber (talk) 04:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Addressed on the Draft Legacypac (talk) 05:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

07:42:34, 26 June 2018 review of submission by Techcherio
hello, I need help because my article seems to rejected, I received this feedback, "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia." Techcherio (talk) 07:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

07:51:40, 26 June 2018 review of submission by DmitryXII
I've come to a bump as my submission was denied for the second time. I have stated that I have a conflict of interest, and as such may not be the best person to remove the "reads like an advertising" flaw. However seeing as the similarly-referenced OMAS SRL. article, and the two companies are similar in the interest shown by the community on both brands is similar. I would greatly appreciate any help in making this article more neutral and factual. DmitryXII (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, I could not review the draft article as the source are form Italian books so I would comment only on how the draft article is written at current stage and will leave the review to other reveiwers. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and the content is summaries by reliable and independent source in neutral point of view with only factual of what the sources stated in usually very dull prose instead of written with the sense or connotation to praise the company or appeal to read emotions. Secondly half of content on the "History"section was unsourced and "Material" and "Decoration" sections have no sources at all. If you would find reliable source which independent from the subject such as from newspaper to support the content claimed, then pls cite them in the body text. Lastly, please read Wikipedia notability requirements here - company    which a page need to meet to merit a page in Wikipedia.   CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

08:44:14, 26 June 2018 review of submission by Nikhiljain founder
Nikhiljain founder (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

12:42:03, 26 June 2018 review of submission by Hasekidms
Hasekidms (talk) 12:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC) To whom it may concern,

We have requested for this page to be published since January of this year. We kept being denied for different reasons. Finally we made a stronger article and submited it for review last week and it was denied yesterday. The decline reason said "Youtube is not a source". We took youtube out and re-submitted again. We are very confused why they are being rejected. We have provided over 20 links to articles written driectly for MIRUD and still being denied we just don't know what else to provide. We have provided so many links to magazines and all of that.

Please someone help us.


 * ,Hi Please note below
 * sources do not indicate as what content claimed - ; song "Puzzle" reach 23 in US Chat - Google search engine is not a source;  "Early life" section - Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR; "Ende Te Dua" reach top 3 in  Kosovo	Albania - source does not indicate such -
 * reliable and independent from the subject (secondary) sources are needed to support the notability of the subject. Interviews, IMBD, utube, home page are primary. Source from major newspaper is secondary source
 * You might have a conflict of interest here as you indicate "we have requested for this page to be published since January of this year" in your message above. You used "We" here. If you are affiliate with the subject either a friends/family member or a paid editor - pls disclose your COI here. Wikipedia strongly discourage COI editor edit on affected page.
 * Pls note Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. Content need to be written in neutral point of view. The draft article at the current stage is written with a connotation of promoting the subject and a more factual and dull prose would be needed.
 * Please read the musician notability requirements needed. If the subject is not notable then no amount of editing and sources provide will merit a page in Wikipedia.
 * Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

13:13:15, 26 June 2018 review of submission by 151.27.138.212
151.27.138.212 (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

14:45:37, 26 June 2018 review of submission by Aalderdice
I wrote a page for the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP) and referenced facts to the AFP website, so the draft was immediately deleted. I then went and revised the page to only include information from scholarly journals and submitted it, however I cannot find it anywhere in drafts and believe it has been deleted. I don't understand why this is, since all the sources I used were from scholarly books/articles. Can you please explain to me why my page was deleted again and what I need to change about the second version?

thank you. Aalderdice (talk) 14:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, You question has been answered at Not sure where my article is /IF it's been deleted, why.... Please do not post question in 2 different help pages at AfC, and in Teahouse Not sure where my article is /IF it's been deleted, why...for volunteer resources would be waste would be waste for answering the same question in 3 forum. Thank you. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 00:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)