Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 June 7

= June 7 =

Request on 03:08:08, 7 June 2018 for assistance on CMG Worldwide submission by 67.69.131.130
I am wondering why the New York Times, CNN, Telegraph, CBS, ABC, and others used in the draft are not considered to be reliable sources or show notability for this company. Considering that this draft was reviewed only a few hours after I posted it, I am not certain a proper review could have taken place by User:Bradv if this was the result. Is it possible to have this reviewed by someone who actually looks at the references used? 67.69.131.130 (talk) 03:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

67.69.131.130 (talk) 03:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * We don't take hours to review a given draft. If you want another review address the concerns on the decline and submit again. Legacypac (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Legacypac - what concerns? That the New York Times isn't a valid publisher? Also, you didn't even read the question properly, I said the review took place haphazardly only a few hours after I posted the draft, not that you should take hours. Is there someone else who can read properly that I can hear from? 67.69.131.130 (talk) 23:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * First, Legacypac did so read your question correctly. Your complaint is that the review took place a few hours after the draft was posted.  Why is that a problem?  Second, you did get another review, and it declined the draft.  Besides, the draft is promotional.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

06:10:49, 7 June 2018 review of submission by Nenzi3316
Can somebody help me to know how i can send a request to wikipedia to create an automatic article about me. Since I have already submitted the draft for review on 15 may but unfortunately it was declined by wikipedia. I have written all the information based on published reliable reference but bad luck. Therefore I request wikipedia to write an article itself. Nenzi3316 (talk) 06:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi . You may ask at Requested articles that an article be written. Recently there has been some internal debate about the effectiveness of requesting an article. The problem is that many people ask for articles on non-notable subjects. Such articles will never be written, which results in an unmanageable list of requests, a "graveyard of bad ideas", to borrow a colleague's phrase. In my experience, some requested articles are written. It may take a long time, but I believe it is a good route to take if you sincerely believe the topic is notable. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

07:26:11, 7 June 2018 review of submission by Amosnear
I'm not even sure why the person who reviewed seemed to not like the concept of colon hydrotherapy, which subject DANIELLE ARSENAULT actually studied and got certified for, it was just mentioned once on the education part of the profile.

Amosnear (talk) 07:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * for the reasons stated on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

07:48:32, 7 June 2018 review of submission by 27.252.148.240
27.252.148.240 (talk) 07:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Well kill this page

14:06:13, 7 June 2018 review of submission by TechvitalCompitar
TechvitalCompitar (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)