Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 March 10

= March 10 =

07:06:55, 10 March 2018 review of submission by Aditya Mani Tripathi
How this draft is being declined if you want to review go to milkipur and ask any body in whole faizabad about him single person now him every politician of faizabad knows him please add article Aditya Mani Tripathi (talk) 07:06, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * - that everybody in Milkipur may know who he was, isn't really the point and the majority of readers aren't going to go and ask. You need to show his Notability by referencing significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of him. I've explained in more detail on the draft comment page the issues the article currently has. KJP1 (talk) 08:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Sam the seagull
is this aren't allowed for article to create? because he's not that notability. pls see this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sam_the_seagull — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cebu Flowerpecker (talk • contribs) 10:12, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * please see comments in the Pink Box at the top of your draft, explaining what you must fix. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

13:20:28, 10 March 2018 review of submission by Thatguy1987
Hello, I accidentally created two AFC Submission boxes, One at the top of the page and one on the bottom, will this cause a problem with submission? Thank you so much.Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi . No, the double submission won't be a problem, but the degree of citation overkill will be. Try to fix that while you wait for the draft to be reviewed. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Worldbruce, Thank you so much for the heads up! Aside from that, would you say there are any other issues with the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguy1987 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * - Just as an observation, although Worldbruce is quite right that you've gone a bit OTT on the citations, it's a terrifically well-structured article for a relatively new editor. When I saw it initially, I thought it must be a lift it was so well done. But I'm just a cynic. Many congrat.s. By-the-by, I'm not sure your COI declaration on your user page is formatted quite correctly. KJP1 (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

KJP1 - thank you so much for your kind words! I really took my time with putting this together. I just cleaned up all of the citation overkill as well. Hopefully that did the trick. Looking forward to seeing if it will be accepted to the mains pace. I knew I definitely did something wrong with the COI formatting was wrong, I will look into fixing that ASAP, Thank you again!Thatguy1987 (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

17:03:03, 10 March 2018 review of submission by Sousatiago6
Sousatiago6 (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC) I'm asking a review for this player http://www.zerozero.pt/player.php?id=265607 There's enough information. Take a look, for example, to another player of FC Porto: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruno_Costa_(Portuguese_footballer,_born_1997) This is even more complete.


 * Hi . It is not a question of the length of the draft compared to the length of any particular article (see also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS), it is a question of whether the subject meets WP:NFOOTBALL. FC Porto ≠ FC Porto B ≠ FC Porto Juniors ≠ FC Porto Veteranos. The draft doesn't make clear in what league FC Porto Veteranos plays. If they play in Primeira Liga or LigaPro, then after he has played in a competitive game against another team in the league, he will be notable. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

19:56:46, 10 March 2018 review of submission by TryKid
Is this draft good enough for mainspace or do I need to do more work on it? Can someone please review it asap?

TryKid (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, TryKid. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.  Our apologies for not yet responding to yesterday's post. I estimate that there are about 900 submissions in the queue ahead of yours.  I expect that it might take about another month before a reviewer gets a chance to take a look at yours. Thank you for your patience.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 22:01:51, 10 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Rjstephan WP
Trying again...I would like to understand the criteria for the non-US leagues listed in WP:NHOOPS #1: "...the original American Basketball Association, Liga ACB, EuroLeague, National Basketball Association, National Basketball League (Australia), National Basketball League (United States), Lega Basket Serie A, Women's National Basketball Association, Greek Basket League, Israeli Basketball Premier League, ABA League (and its predecessor the Yugoslav Basketball League), or the VTB United League (and its predecessors the USSR Premier Basketball League and the Russian Professional Basketball Championship)." Does the non-US league need to apply to make this list or what? Thanks You. Rjstephan WP (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Rjstephan WP (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi . If you feel the Japanese B.League should be on that list, the place to propose a change in the guideline is Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). Here at Articles for creation, notability guidelines are only applied, not modified. One of the more recent proposals to broaden notability for basketball players was Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 28, which did not result in a change. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)