Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 March 18

= March 18 =

11:25:30, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Arno Hazekamp
Hello. I want to ask about AK-47 article submission. I have rewrited information from table at http://www.ncsm.nl/strain/ak-47 page and included it into the article. Should I use another source? Or I can just remove referencing? Arno Hazekamp (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi . The draft is very short, and cites a single source. Therefore the topic would be more appropriate as a sub-section of Cannabis strains than as a stand alone article. If the sub-section grows large enough, with well-sourced information, it could be spun-out into a stand alone article in the future. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you, . I saw this strain in List of names for cannabis, so decided to add article for it. How large article should be?
 * . Guideline Article size contains some relevant information. I would not spinout AK-47 until that sub-section has grown so large that it overwhelms the rest of the varieties section. There is no exact answer, but I would say it should be at least twice as long as the Charlotte's Web sub-section before it would be worth spinning out. More importantly, it should reference at least three in-depth reliable sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

21:40:04, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Tialaramex
When people search for "62 Group" they get shown an anti-fascists. Who are awesome, but also ceased to exist a long time ago. The 62 Group of Textile Artists still exists, it'd be nice if Wikipedia suggested that might be what they're looking for. I have seen two different things on Wikipedia, is one or other of them a good choice here?

1. Mentioning the other article in each page, saying e.g. "This article is about the anti-fascist group, for the artistic collective, see 62 Group of Textile Artists"

2. A disambiguation page which lists all the things the reader might be looking for under the name "62 Group" (currently two things, but maybe there are others?)

Tialaramex (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I've added a hatnote to this article. ww2censor (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

22:47:36, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Bhusyma
Bhusyma (talk) 22:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)