Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 November 12

= November 12 =

04:18:53, 12 November 2018 review of submission by Farooqahmadbhat
What is your question? Legacypac (talk) 05:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

I processed all but one of these pages. Declined most, CSD'd one, and accepted the village. Legacypac (talk) 06:05, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Sir, I object your decision. You have only declined quality and notable pages. I do not believe that some Wikipedia administrators review our articles so poorly. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Bro, Would you please give your opinion on the declined drafts? Drafts are being discussed here on Legacypac's (talk page) -- Farooqahmadbhat (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Frayæ (Frayæ)

There appears to be various fragmented discussions already, and an email in my inbox, I could reply in various places but I will just outline my thoughts here. You can refer to my comment by linking to it elsewhere if you want. I hope this helps. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Junaid Azim Mattu as the Mayor of Srinagar is not presumed notable under WP:NPOL. Politicians that don't meet that guideline are hard to prove notable and will need more than a short stub.
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tina Dabi will decide the fate of Tina Dabi. As the title has already be create protected in mainspace I suspect COI or paid editing in the past on that subject.
 * Peer Ki Gali is notable, as noted by Legacypac the article is closely paraphrased and needs to be rewritten slightly to avoid copyright issues, this is a prose issue. Check and.
 * Bufliaz has been approved.
 * Rafia Rahim and Mehak Zubair are low profile radio presenters, to have the articles accepted you need to expand the articles and add more references to show why they are significant.

10:22:32, 12 November 2018 review of submission by BridgeScript
I would like to get a second opinion on a declined draft. Here is the discussion we had with the reviewer who suggested getting a second opinion: User_talk:BridgeScript

BridgeScript (talk) 10:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The topic is not notable due to there being insufficient references to pass WP:NCORP. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

How do you mean "pass"? Can you point out those references that do not "pass"? BridgeScript (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The notability guideline is like a test applied to the article to see if it passes the minimum standard for inclusion. You need at minimum two or three times as many similar references, or at least two substantial articles in national news in addition to the references already in the article to pass. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the info. BridgeScript (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

11:58:02, 12 November 2018 review of draft by Laurel Brunner
Laurel Brunner (talk) 11:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

What should I do to get this article posted? I keep trying and get no help at all and am confused by all the options of nonspecific guidance. I am sure I am not as clever as everyone else on here, but I am doing my best.

Can someone tell me what more do I need to show that this topic is notable? Why it has been referred to as “garbage“ (which is hardly an objective statement, given that it is only a short text)? Why is submitting updates in response to objections considered worthy of deletion?

I am new to this whole process so I think a little constructive support is not an unreasonable expectation. Here is the text I propose as a new article topic, along with its supporting external references. Please could someone tell me what is wrong with it, and how I fix it. Thank you.

•	{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Laurel Brunner|U1-employer=Digital Dots|U1-client=Xeikon INternational BV|U1-otherlinks=http://verdigrisproject.com, https://www.printingnews.com/home/contact/10290626/laurel-brunner https://insights.ricoh.co.uk/author/laurelbrunner https://www.asiaprintexpo.com/speakers/laurel-brunner https://www.printmedianieuws.nl/laurel-brunner/}}.

Xeikon Xeikon was founded by Lucien de Schamphelaere in 1988 to develop a digital colour printing press. In 1993 the company introduced its technology at an international trade show. Indigo, now HP Indigo, also introduced a digital colour printing press at this show. Together these two companies established a new printing method and revolutionised the printing industrythe principles of which have been widely followed leading to new applications for print, such as photobooks.

References & Sources "https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/20/business/company-news-xeikon-adr-s-surge-on-first-day-of-trading.html". The New York Times. March 20, 1996: COMPANY NEWS; XEIKON A.D.R.'S SURGE ON FIRST DAY OF TRADING Intro: The American depository receipts of Xeikon N.V., a Belgian maker of digital printing systems, surged 34 percent yesterday in their first day of trading. The company, which is seeking to capture part of the short-run color printing market, sold 6.4 million A.D.R.'s at $15 each to raise $96 million.

"https://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/29/business/xerox-is-offering-a-new-category-of-color-printer.html" The New York Times. April 29, 1996. Xerox Is Offering a New Category of Color Printer Hoping to find a color-printing niche with machines that sell for about $200,000 each, the Xerox Corporation has introduced its Docu-color printer, which can transform electronic files into full color pages at a rate of 40 sheets a minute. (…) For the most demanding color-printing customers, even faster machines with better quality are available in the $350,000 to $400,000 price range. The AM DCP-1, Agfa Chromapress and IBM 3170, all of which use a print engine made by Xeikon of Belgium, and the Indigo E-Print 1000 each print up to 70 pages a minute.

"presse-archiv/artikel/FAZ/20000129/agfa-digitaldruck-geht-an-xeikon/FR220000129311326.html" Frankfurter Allgemeine. January 29, 2000. Agfa-Digitaldruck geht an Xeikon (‘Agfa Digital Printing goes to Xeikon’) Das Geschäftsfeld Digitale Drucksysteme soll an die auf diesem Gebiet zu den international führenden Anbietern gehörende Xeikon N.V. verkauft werden. Im Gegenzug werde Agfa-Gevaert weitere an der amerikanischen Nasdaq notierte Xeikon-Aktien erhalten und damit die Beteiligung an diesem Unternehmen von 20,1 Prozent auf höchstens 25,5 Prozent aufstocken.

"http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dst30012002_084" De Standaard. January 30, 2002. De neergang van Xeikon (‘Xeikon’s fall’) Timeline of Xeikon’s rise and fall since its 1996 Nasdaq listing

"https://www.tijd.be/algemeen/algemeen/george-soros-bederft-agfa-s-vlaamse-wereldprimeur/5120574.html" De Tijd, June 23, 1993. George Soros spoils Agfa’s world premiere De Hongaars-Amerikaanse spekulant George Soros en Benny Landa bederven de Vlaamse wereldprimeur van Agfa-dochter Xeikon uit Mortsel.

"https://www.tijd.be/algemeen/algemeen/Vlaanderen-is-even-goed-in-high-tech-als-Silicon-Valley/5120632" De Tijd, June 24, 1993. Flanders can match Silicon Valley’s high tech Met de ontwikkeling van de eerste digitale kleurendrukpers bewijzen we in Vlaanderen even goed te zijn als de high-tech bedrijven in Silicon Valley. Het is dus ook mogelijk in Vlaanderen', stelt Xeikon-voorzitter Lucien De Schamphelaere.

"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/may/03/printing-revolution-landa-xeikon-drupa" The Guardian, May 3, 2012. Rivals launch a printing revolution that could be as significant as Gutenberg Landa and Xeikon to unveil new inkjet and toner technology at drupa exhibition in Düsseldorf This week will see the launch of a revolution in printing that may turn out to be as significant as the invention of the Gutenberg printing press - if entrepreneurs and analysts are to be believed.

Sources

Laurel Brunner (talk) 11:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * We don't want the topic and you keep trying to force us to accept it. That is not very nice. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

16:45:29, 12 November 2018 review of draft by DalyceKelley
DalyceKelley (talk) 16:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, please change my draft article title from DJ Bay Bay to just Bay Bay when reviewed as I have learned he is referred to as just Bay Bay aka Bay Bay The Ambassador. Thank you.


 * I moved it. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:49, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

20:24:47, 12 November 2018 review of submission by Rmilnes
This is a page describing a branded technology. Is it at all possible to get a page on a branded technology published? There are unique elements to the technology. In principle there is no generic description for the technology other than by reference to the brand name. The original draft is extremely rich in clinical references, as well as the pros and cons of other technologies.

Rmilnes (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * See the helpful guidence on the draft. Legacypac (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)