Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 22

= October 22 =

11:04:02, 22 October 2018 review of submission by A.E.Booth95
A.E.Booth95 (talk) 11:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I received an email last night saying that my new Wikipedia article on The Early Music Shop has been reviewed, and I was wondering if I could ask a quick question about approximately when I should expect the Wikipedia page to be indexed and appear on search engines e.g. Google? Thanks.


 * Can't say with certainty. It could be a couple of days or take several weeks depending on how long it takes for a NPR reviewer to assess it. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

14:22:48, 22 October 2018 review of submission by Navysaylorgirl
A few months ago, I submitted an article, which was initially rejected for a few reasons. I've subsequently worked on it, using the advice from the editors I've spoken with. I thought I resubmitted the draft for review, but I don't think that it's actually in the queue to be re-reviewed. Could someone please tell me if it's in the right spot or not? And if it's not, how to move it? TY

Navysaylorgirl (talk) 14:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * It was not in the review queue. I have submitted it for review for you. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

15:38:44, 22 October 2018 review of draft by Robpaulmeyer
Robpaulmeyer (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

How do I change the name of my article title that is pending review? I did not know that what I called it would be user facing, so I titled it "Rob Meyer Wiki" when it should just be "Rob Meyer".


 * I moved it to Draft:Rob Meyer. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

16:29:39, 22 October 2018 review of draft by TS-220657
I am trying to find out if I submitted my draft article correctly on August 1, 2018, as I cannot find it in the list of submissions on that date (though I find it in the list of very old submissions). The title is : Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance

TS-220657 (talk) 16:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi TS, your draft is currently submitted, when it is accepted, commented on or declined you should get a notification. Cheers. JC7V -talk  16:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Here is the link to it from the AFC submissions category page: Category:AfC_pending_submissions_by_age/Very_old&pagefrom=201807311914%0ANice+Horse#mw-pages JC7V -talk  16:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

17:30:45, 22 October 2018 review of submission by Aleeereza
Thanks for reviewing the submission. Per wikipedia guideline(s):

"significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondarysources that are independent of the subject:"

Here are some citations, I've included them in the submission article too. As you'll notice there are multiple citations spanning about 2 years

May 2016 https://www.ca.com/us/modern-software-factory/content/the-company-checkbook-goes-paperless.html Wired.com (both online and in paper form, alexa rank ~450 in the US ) is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

July 2016 http://www.digitaltransactions.net/with-checkbook-a-payments-veteran-creates-a-souped-up-engine-for-check-21-clearing/ Digital Transactions is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

Aug 2017 https://theamericangenius.com/tech-news/checkbook-device/ American Genius is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

Oct 2017 https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/checkbookio-offers-digital-checks-and-invoicing-services Accounting Today is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

Aleeereza (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * You have not yet added these sources to the draft or resubmitted it. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

19:42:31, 22 October 2018 review of draft by Dbrubin
I am contributing a page for an academic colleague. The page was rejected because of lack of references. The editor also asked about notability.

My colleague holds a named chair at an R1 university. I had provided references to publications by reputable sources: Institute of Mathematical Statistics (their official bulletin, also available in print), and official faculty listing at Temple University.

I am not sure what more is needed. Please advise.

Dbrubin (talk) 19:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Approved to Edoardo Airoldi. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)