Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 25

= October 25 =

00:57:21, 25 October 2018 review of draft by MediaEditNZ
Hello! I am trying to get this article to the mainspace. The first series 100 Day Bach is already on the mainspace. This is the new TV season of this series. Thank you! --MediaEditNZ (talk) 00:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

MediaEditNZ (talk) 00:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have approved it under WP:TVSHOW however I'm not convinced that merging the seasons into a single articles would not be a good idea. Also have you followed WP:COI and WP:PAID? Legacypac (talk) 01:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you Legacypac. I will take a look. Appreciate your help. Thank you! --MediaEditNZ (talk) 01:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

08:17:07, 25 October 2018 review of submission by 164.215.104.169
I have put together this page about Mark Mosimann, that is entirely fact based with appropriate external references from neutral sources, but have been told that it is too advertorial. As none of the sources are from advertorial feeds, rather they are from editorial, I do not understand how this is a valid reason for the page to be dismissed?

Many thanks for your assistance.

164.215.104.169 (talk) 08:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * A page like that draft has no clear encyclopedic purpose. The purpose of the page is clearly to promote the subject, which is advertorial. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

12:25:13, 25 October 2018 review of submission by Markatmojo
I don't understand why my article has been rejected.

Markatmojo (talk) 12:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Mojo Mortgages is not eligible for a Wikipedia article. To understand why you will need to read Wikipedia's policies on notability. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

13:12:50, 25 October 2018 review of submission by SaviiDigital
This is my first article and I was prepared to wait for 2 months to get my article to be reviewed and in 3 minutes it got declined and the reason was that it is too much like an add. Can anyone please help me figure out what parts are reading like an add text since I have not yet figured out what subjects are off limits and how my article got reviewed so fast. Thank you, Not The Sharpest Tool in the Box :)

SaviiDigital (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * It was reviewed fast because it is so obvious that it is not in compliance with Wikipedia policy. There are lots of similar drafts that get created and declined because they are what I can only describe as advertising for cryptocurrency startups. The entire article, even the subject is the problem here. You won't get anywhere by fixing a few bits of the article. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

13:38:44, 25 October 2018 review of draft by Suresh D Sarada
Hello, I submitted a draft more that two months ago, and I understand that reviewing takes time. However, I am not able to find my draft in the Category:Pending AfC submissions, it is just not visible. Is there any possibility that my wikitext is lacking some code and how to fix that to make my draft visible for potential editor? Suresh D Sarada (talk) 13:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Suresh, your submission is here, in the 'very old' submission category. Cheers. JC7V -talk  15:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Declined. No evidence of notability. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)