Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 5

= October 5 =

03:18:23, 5 October 2018 review of draft by 68.103.78.155
Can you Put the 2019-20 United States Network Televison Schedule to article space please. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 03:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

68.103.78.155 (talk) 03:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The article looks unfinished and mostly blank. 2019 is still some time off. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

04:36:28, 5 October 2018 review of submission by Partha Varanashi
I really don't understand this format of work. My sources are legit, As the article is about my grandfather. It would a great help to simplify this. Partha Varanashi (talk)


 * It's a good start, try to add sources and put them inline. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * - You will also need to officially state your Conflict of interests, as you are related to the subject.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

06:28:52, 5 October 2018 review of draft by Yulokyuan
Yulokyuan (talk) 06:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * It can't be accepted until it is no longer an advertisement. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

07:13:52, 5 October 2018 review of draft by 3dukasyon
3dukasyon (talk) 07:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Edukasyon.ph was reviewed more than a moth ago and I provided all the necessary citations and links to the article, yet I haven't received any feedback until now.


 * It has been declined already. Please read the comments on the draft. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

11:45:59, 5 October 2018 review of draft by Rufus2017
Rufus2017 (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello I'm trying to submit an article but it keeps being rejected due to unreliable sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Petroc_Sesti&action=edit I am unclear as to what is unreliable about these sources. Please could you clarify? Thanks, Alex


 * Sources need to be independent of the subject, I think that sources from a gallery the artist is affiliated with are being treated as unreliable because they are effectively self published. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

13:04:01, 5 October 2018 review of submission by 23.241.37.38
I am trying to find out who was the owner of my home and had it built in 1941 fourth Street San Fernando Ca. and what was the lot size??? 23.241.37.38 (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, anon. You are going to have to look somewhere else, unfortunately. Wikipedia is not the place for this.  JTP (talk • contribs) 14:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * You may be able to find information from a local historical society, museum, the local town hall, county archive, or by looking at your ownership documents. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

14:05:14, 5 October 2018 review of submission by Francman200
Completely revamped the details and added more references and prominent family ties. The contact is not only a successful and renowned business entrepreneur but is also the son of a prominent philanthropist and art collector and the grandson of a famous media figure. Francman200 (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The fact of having a famous relative is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article. Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass WP:GNG. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

15:26:31, 5 October 2018 review of submission by Jamaican Wiki
HDKyle, How can I get this page approved? Jamaican Wiki (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * To be truthful I don't think you can because the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you really must get that draft approved, read WP:COI and follow the instructions. Then read WP:RS, WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC to get an idea of the policies which your work is being assessed against and rewrite the draft with significant improvements before submitting it again. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:36, 5 October 2018 (UTC)