Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 September 17

= September 17 =

05:17:13, 17 September 2018 review of draft by Ahnaf Lion
I submitted an article that was declined. However, suggestion were made how i could improve the article so that it can be published. Following those guidelines, i resubmitted it. Usually,how long does it take to review a re-submission? Ahnaf Lion (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi . The duration of a submit-review cycle is currently running 2-3 months. Use the time to make the draft the best it can be. For example:
 * remove content that doesn't cite a source
 * remove citations to trivial mentions like https://www.livemint.com/Consumer/1fdrSpRemsgnYiyfZW68vK/In-advertising-the-action-is-outside.html
 * format citations in accordance with Help:Referencing for beginners
 * follow the Manual of Style
 * --Worldbruce (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

05:45:51, 17 September 2018 review of submission by Quazarrr
Hi there, this page easily satisfies WP:BAND and there should be no question that a Wikipedia page should be created considering their size, influence and notoriety in the music industry. (A list detailing how they satisfy this criteria is on Cullen’s talk page). Just because the page has been created very poorly multiple times by overexcited fans in the past (and rightly rejected, as these articles were not up to Wikipedia standard) doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t deserve an article now - billions of streams, headlining at the most prestigious international concerts in the world, EPs charting on the Billboard and a debut album at number 6 on the iTunes charts evidence this. Could you please elaborate? Thanks. Quazarrr (talk) 05:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Your sources on Cullen's page were wildly misrepresented and as I broke it down on the talk page of the draft and on my own talk page, they were present in prior AFDs, which gives us no reason to think this is any different. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

11:32:27, 17 September 2018 review of draft by Aanuarif
I am unable to understand why my submission was rejected considering the fact that artists of the similar nature have their pages on Wikipedia and I do not see any "Reliable Sources" on their pages as well. I can give as many examples as you want but for reference, I am giving the link to Sara Haider's page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sara_Haider. All I can see here are the interviews which are not reliable and independent. If there is a set criterion, it should be similar for all pages. I'm very disappointed but I would really like to know how I can improve the article to make it acceptable in your views. Looking forward to your kind response.11:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Aanuarif (talk) Aanuarif (talk) 11:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Sara Haider won a Lux Style Award, Natasha Khan has not. Please read WP:NMUSIC. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi. But Natasha Khan appeared in two seasons of Coke Studio i.e. Season 9 and Season 10. Can you please tell me which links are reliable and which ones are not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aanuarif (talk • contribs) 12:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * for the reasons explained on the draft. See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

13:54:56, 17 September 2018 review of draft by Smeilychanel
Last time I submitted the page, it was declined because it needed more reliable sources. Now I have added a few references, but I don't know if I hve made correct citations or whether more references are needed in order to consider this article more reliable and accurate. Smeilychanel (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi You need to put the existing citations inline, read Inline citation. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Request on 16:37:44, 17 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ringreiril Ranglong
COPYVIO REMOVED

References: In 1880 G.H. Damant, the then Political Officer of Naga Hills, in his research paper, "Notes on the locality and Population of the Tribes Dwelling betweenthe Brahmaputra and Ningthi Rivers" in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Page 237, Published in Stanford University, USA, Put the Ranglong Community under Old Kuki.

C.A. Soppit (1887), the then Assistant Commissioner, Burma and Sub-Divisional Officer, North Cachar Hills, Assam, in his research works ‘A short Account of the Kuki-Lushai Tribe on the North-East Frontier’ published at Harvard University, USA, clearly mentioned about the community of Ranglong in his preface on the account of the tribes.

G.A. Grierson (1904), one of the most renowned linguistic scholars, in his extensive research works, ‘The Linguistic Survey of India, 1904’ in Volume III, Part III – ‘Tibeto-Burman family’ had identified the Ranglong as separate community and accordingly undertook detailed linguistic research on Ranglong language. As per his record in 1904, the Ranglong populations were about 6,266.

T.C Hodson (1911), the then Assistant Political Agent in Manipur and Superintendent of the State, in his book, ‘The Naga Tribes of Manipur’ published in University of London, also identified the Ranglong as separate community as against Halam, Rangkhol etc., and put it under Old Kuki group. It could be viewed in page 19.

Colonel Shakespeare (1912), in his extensive works on linguistic co-relation among various tribes namely ‘The Lushei Kuki Clan’ published in the University of California, highlighted Ranglong as distinct to other tribal languages. It could be viewed in page 227 & 225.

Kenneth VanBik (2009), in his research works on, ‘Proto-Kuki-Chin: A Reconstructed Ancestor of the Kuki-Chin Language’ published in University of California, Berkeley, grouped the Ranglong with Old Kuki as against Halam Rangkhol, Aimol etc. It could be viewed in page 20.

M.K Bhasin (2006), in his research works, ‘Genetics of Castes and Tribes of India: Indian Population Milieu’ published in Int J Hum Genet, 2006, clearly identified the Ranglong as separate community alongside Lushai/Mizo, Rangkhol, Halam etc. It could be viewed in page 268, Volume 6(3).

Ringreiril Ranglong (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above is a reposting of User:Ringreiril Ranglong/sandbox, which itself is a copyvio of http://e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=news_section.opinions.The_imbroglio_of_ethnic_identity_of_Ranglong_By_Antiarbum_Ranglong . --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

17:15:28, 17 September 2018 review of draft by 68.103.78.155
They Are 3 References on that article but I hope it's enough to make it in to Article Space. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

68.103.78.155 (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * It is unlikely to be accepted until February 2019. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

18:27:42, 17 September 2018 review of draft by TheChau26
I submitted an article a while ago and was told I had to make changes. I made the changes and resubmitted for review, but have not gotten any feedback as yet. The article is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jet_Setting_Jasmine

I would like to get an update, if possible, from an alternate reviewer from my original reviewer. Can that be done?

TheChau26 (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi The article is submitted for review and will be reviewed at some point. I will point out that the overall tone of the article is still advertorial and the references should be inline. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)