Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 12

= April 12 =

07:12:36, 12 April 2019 review of submission by Mjdiamzon
I've inserted references from notable sources. TRG is very known in the Hospitality Industry. They worked with Hilton Group, Best Western and other big hotel groups globally for over 2 decades now. Mjdiamzon (talk) 07:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi I concur with the reviewers of Draft:TRG International, it is not a notable company. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

08:40:49, 12 April 2019 review of submission by Chinics
All the contents is factual and has no propaganda. All the content is verifiable. Could you please indicate which content violates copyrights. Chinics (talk) 08:40, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Replied below, in April 14 section. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

08:55:22, 12 April 2019 review of submission by Chinics
Redacted section has been removed.

Chinics (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Replied below, in April 14 section. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

09:08:58, 12 April 2019 review of submission by Ed Emery 2015
The person is eminently suitable for a Wiki page. He is a very important historical and cultural figure

The problem is that the only sources available are sources in the Kurdish-Sorani language - a language which I do not read or understand.

That is the reason why the article needs to be posted in its present form, so that we can then build on it.

The other problem is that the verification data for the singer's activities is contained in the many YouTube clips of his performances.

But Wikipedia does not permit me to include YouTube clips.

In short... what do you suggest is the best way to proceed?

Ed Emery 2015 (talk) 09:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . If the only sources are in Central Kurdish, then leave the topic to someone who can read the language. There is no deadline. There are millions of ways you could help the encyclopedia without reading that language. See Community portal for places to start. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

09:27:16, 12 April 2019 review of draft by Krutika Samnani
I have submitted an article. Please review it and accept it and yes I have made all the changes I was suppose to do. Krutika Samnani (talk) 09:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * hello. Unfortunatly, I have reviewed your draft at Crave Eatables and decided to decline the draft as failing to meet WP:NCORP. Please note that to be included on Wikipedia, company articles must cite sufficient coverage in reliable, in-depth, independent sources; only one of your draft's four sources comes close to meeting this category, as noted by past reviewers. You can continue to try to improve the draft (try to find more sources like ), but note that if it is declined again, it will probably be rejected. Best.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

09:46:39, 12 April 2019 review of submission by Sonnenalle44
I want to publish a page about an artist. Please can someone help me make it 'suitable' - so far I have had it rejected being too listy, and another editor unfortunately believes me to be involved with the subject. Any help very much appreciated.

Sonnenalle44 (talk) 09:46, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

09:59:40, 12 April 2019 review of submission by Chinics
I read that the article is rejected as it has been deemed contrary to the purposes of Wikipedia. Could you please indicate the sections that need amendment in order to bring the article into conformity. Chinics (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Replied below, in April 14 section. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

17:43:02, 12 April 2019 review of draft by SD1014
Hi there, I have been waiting for a couple of months for a reviewer to provide some guidance as the previous reviewer is on the fence about notability though he notes the submission passes other checks. I believe I have provided enough third-party sources to demonstrate notability (e.g., BBC, Psychology Today, Fortune, Financial Times, etc.), especially as there are others who have pages with far fewer news sources (e.g., Jeffrey_Pfeffer). Any guidance is immensely appreciated as I have done my best to be diligent with the writing and submission, as I have in the past when creating a submission for Alexandre Reza. Thank you so much! PS: I just realized one of my citations did not post correctly, so I will update that now on the submission. Many thanks in advance! SD1014 (talk) 17:43, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. So generally it isn't productive to compare a draft to other pages. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles, be sure to use only Wikipedia's best.


 * Since you mention creating Alexandre Reza, are you saying you previously edited under the name User:Sdesai1? If so, in the interest of transparency it would be best to disclose that on your user page. You can do so by adding  to User:SD1014.


 * A case can be made for notability using Psychology Today, Fortune (the DuBois article), and the Financial Times. Interviews such as the BBC one are primary sources, and may be discounted for the purposes of establishing notability if they lack independent analysis by the interviewer. Audio sources are allowed, but are frequently problematic. If you can find the quotation in the source, please add to the citation the time at which it occurs, for example . Beyond that, squeeze any additional material you can out of DuBois and Bradshaw. If possible, get rid of some of the other sources to help make the best ones stand out. It may not be important, for example, exactly which magazines Wadhwa has written for (or all the well-known figures he has studied). The point to be made is that he is better known for writing in the mass media than for any scholarly publications. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)