Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 15

= April 15 =

03:00:53, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Chbang
I am requesting another review, since I asked for advice and made corrections, from the advice given (see note from Alpha3031 below) Chbang (talk) 03:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

03:00:53, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Chbang

Draft:The Clap (band) Chbang (talk · contribs) (TB) Draft:The Clap (band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I am requesting a review of this wiki, because it is my first wiki and I'm still learning the rules. I believe The Clap (band) is a notable topic and should be reviewed and accepted in the wikipedia.

Do I have too many citations that are considered "not notable". Can I keep those citations, as I feel they are important to the topic? Chbang (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Chbang, I think the main problem is that those sources aren't reliable for neutral information (not fact checked or trying to sell you stuff), so any information based on them may be suspect. Having too many of those also clutters things up badly. I'd suggesting picking 3 or 4 of the best/most important, maximum, and moving them to the external links section. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:09, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

05:13:16, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Tamir.te
The artist page I am trying to add has no international reference, yet. Many other Mongolian bands, and artists have English wiki page with no verified reference. Why is this not getting approved?

Tamir.te (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * - the rules about notability have changed immensely over time, and it can take a long time for us to apply it to all the older articles. Many of our newly deleted articles are for musicians and bands that do not have references and were only allowed in when the rules were less strict. The fact that there are still articles with poor sourcing does not mean we should allow others - the page WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a good explanation of why. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

07:13:54, 15 April 2019 review of draft by EnochLi
EnochLi (talk) 07:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

how long will it take to draft my article i hope soon because Attack an castle is my first article
 * We are an encyclopedia, not a game guide. None of your minecraft-related topics are suitable for inclusion.  JTP (talk • contribs) 13:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

07:43:33, 15 April 2019 review of submission by 27.96.95.197
I am still unable to find what is causing Wikipedia to delete this article? Khalid Salamat is well known name in Marketing Industry in UAE.

27.96.95.197 (talk) 07:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * - the article was rejected because there were not suitable sources - your two sources are either written by the subject or is acting as a marketing statement about him. Please have a look at this for the types of sources we prefer. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

07:45:01, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Madoro Ishii
Draft:Yōmei Bunko

I was told that the submission was not adequately supported by reliable sources. Is that because the references were in Japanese? Should I put English texts or if I omit the Japanese words and put only the reference titles in English, it won't make problems. Please let me know. Madoro Ishii (talk) 07:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * As the reviewer of this translation of https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%BD%E6%98%8E%E6%96%87%E5%BA%AB, would you elaborate on your decline so that the submitter can take corrective action? --Worldbruce (talk) 03:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you import all the sources from the Japanese Wiki and remove the 'edit' from the page, alonside [1].___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   12:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The Japanese version of the article has five more inline citations, numbers 14-18. The reviewer would like you to copy those notes or references to the relevant places in the translated article. They may be in Japanese, but it would be good to at least add an English translation in parentheses afterwards, as you've done with some of the other references. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

08:26:38, 15 April 2019 review of draft by Alislaura
My article was rejected because it didn't show sufficient coverage of the subject by secondary sources. Meanwhile the first image of a black hole has made headlines around the world. Many of the newspaper articles (FAZ, reporting on the findings make reference to the BlackHoleCam project, as do the scientific papers published in Astrophysical Journal Letters. Would these references be sufficient to remove the reasons for declining the article?

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7#references https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wissen/weltraum/schwarzes-loch-zwei-jahre-bis-zum-bild-16134544.html http://www.prometheus-tv.de/news.php?id=22324 https://www.sardinienintim.com/2019/04/12/erstes-foto-schwarzes-loch-sarde-nuoro-chef-black-hole-cam-astrophysiker/ https://dailygalaxy.com/2019/04/the-black-hole-cam-technology-a-one-way-door-out-of-our-universe/

Thanks for your help.

Alislaura (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . No, these references would not be sufficient. There is only a small amount of information about Black Hole Cam in each source, and much of that information is the same in each source. There isn't enough information to add more than a sentence or two to what Event Horizon Telescope already says about the project, "key theoretical aspects of the project were developed in the EU-funded Black Hole Cam project, lead by Falcke, Michael Kramer, and Luciano Rezzolla." --Worldbruce (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

08:35:31, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Bogdanisaimir
Bogdanisaimir (talk) 08:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

09:30:01, 15 April 2019 review of draft by EnochLi
EnochLi (talk) 09:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

why is'nt it going to review?


 * - it isn't going to review because it isn't even attempting to be the encyclopedic article that is necessary for wikipedia - instead this is more like a short review essay on mods. In any case, we have an article not just on Minecraft but Minecraft mods - however, your edits will need to be better constructed to remain - I'd advise suggesting them on the talk page first. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

09:49:58, 15 April 2019 review of submission by EnochLi
EnochLi (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

please

DUPLICATE - see above Nosebagbear (talk)

10:01:32, 15 April 2019 review of submission by EnochLi
EnochLi (talk) 10:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

can you help me to make my minecraft article better?
 * Wikipedia has essentially no interest in anything you or I want to say about anything. It is only interested in what reliable sources have published about a subject. Wikipedia is also not a place for "how to do something". Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

10:34:47, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Waeltely
Hi,

Rayshad Rauf is an emerged playback singer who has entered in the malayalam film industry in India. He is also popular now among the expat community in the UAE for his consistent artistic profile and is an example to many who work hard for a living, parallel keeping their passion alive. His achievement of entry into the professional movie industry is a must showcase not only because he is now a playback singer but also an inspiration to those who struggle to keep their passion alive.

Please refer to his latest news link on Gulf News - https://gulfnews.com/uae/how-a-dubai-boy-became-a-viral-malayalam-playback-singer-1.62906164

Please reconsider and help publish his profile as this will help us achieve in communicating positive inspiration about like wise relevant individuals in future as well.

Thank you. Waeltely (talk) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The subject is not yet sufficiently notable to have a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not the venue for promoting him. Theroadislong (talk) 11:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

10:44:49, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Khalid2c
KHALID MOHIDDIN (talk) 10:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

12:22:55, 15 April 2019 review of draft by Publicationaccess
We trust this message finds you well. This is just a courtesy inquiry. We have have made edits in accordance with the comment on March 28th, 2019 regarding the subject draft. Sources are updated. Of course continued efforts will be made to improve the draft. We would like to move the draft into the main article space. Thank you so much for taking the time to assist. Have a great week. Publicationaccess (talk) 12:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Publicationaccess (talk) 12:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Who is "we"?  JTP (talk • contribs) 13:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

12:35:33, 15 April 2019 review of draft by Karen Sandstrom
Any chance you can help me get the Grafton J. Nunes pages moving forward? It seems to be making no progress toward review. Thanks. Karen Sandstrom (talk) 12:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Just declined for notability issues, as well as a potential concern about undisclosed paid editing Nosebagbear (talk)

14:05:02, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Asheprajwalvasist
why my page is declined..? Asheprajwalvasist (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * That is explained in the decline notice, your draft has no sources so cannot be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 14:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Request on 17:08:28, 15 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Hairydreams
Greetings,

My name is Pooya Khorramyar and I am publishing my music under the pseudonym of Hairydreams. I already wrote the article in my sandbox and cited it as much as possible. Even for the websites that are no longer alive, I took my time and found the specific link form the Web Archive Organisation and linked them respectively.

However, my music is only published on the online platforms (such as Spotify and iTunes), and Wikipedia does not recognise them as a valid citation.

I highly appreciate if you help me to edit my article in the way that it be acceptable for Wikipedia and I don't face any issues of validity in the future.

Having this article on Wikipedia is very important to me as it gives my fans a credible reference to refer to.

Regards, Hairydreams (talk) 17:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

17:10:24, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Scharrlib
I'm hoping to get some help with regards to my draft page for ScHARR - The School of Health and Related Research. The last entry says I have zero chance of getting my page published, but this conflicts with previous messages asking me to edit my page and remove any elements which may seem like advertising, which I now understand. I worked on the page, so am a little concerned why it was rejected after the first reviews did not reject it. The reviewer said that: "departments are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field". The School of Health related Research is as notable as York's Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Reviews_and_Dissemination In the 25 years since it started (same year as CRD) it has published over 10,000 peer reviewed academic journal articles and is a world leader in the areas of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics and helps form the NHS decision making. We are larger and more successful academically than some of the departments currently listed under Sheffield, so not sure why we can't be accepted. Also, we are a school not a department, so I think that fits in with Wikipedia's standards. Any help would be really appreciated.

Andy

Scharrlib (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

19:00:21, 15 April 2019 review of submission by Haimantirakshitdas
Haimantirakshitdas (talk) 19:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)