Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 19

= April 19 =

02:12:57, 19 April 2019 review of submission by CCFBROWN
The article was denied due to insufficient content, would it be accepted if more information about Scott Neeson and his NGO were added? CCFBROWN (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

04:29:49, 19 April 2019 review of submission by DCmax1k
I would like to publish this article for a streamer of the name DCmax1k. It was rejected because the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion. What would make this better? DCmax1k (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Rejection is the reviewer's way of saying that no amount of editing can make the draft acceptable. Please understand that unlike Facebook or LinkedIn, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to write about yourself or your friends. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If and when Dylan Caldwell has done something that is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, then sooner or later someone unconnected to him will create an article about him. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

05:04:28, 19 April 2019 review of draft by RevinCBHatol
There are sources around the internet for a list of episodes, but I can't find the perfect one. Please help. RevinCBHatol (talk) 05:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC) RevinCBHatol (talk) 05:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

05:54:04, 19 April 2019 review of submission by Md Mohsin Ansari
Wanted to know my article will get approved. As I'm new to this platform

Md Mohsin Ansari (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * u|Md Mohsin Ansari, greeting. You page Draft:Troop Messenger was rejected and pls see the comment on the draft page by the reviewer. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

05:57:59, 19 April 2019 review of submission by 71.202.0.54
Can someone help me write the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:System_call_interposition - SCI is significant enough to warrant a wiki page, and there's numerous independent, reliable sources at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22system+call+interposition%22  I'd appreciate if you can let me know how to improve it, or if you want to just go ahead and improve it that is good too.

71.202.0.54 (talk) 05:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

10:33:55, 19 April 2019 review of submission by Parblo
Hello. Our page is created for digital art fans and newbie artists to see about our brand. Can you please help me edit this wiki page. We have done the best I can. Can you please tell me what we need to fix?

Thanks.

Parblo (talk) 10:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

So terrible interface. "You asked why this is so complicated. The reason is because this is an encyclopedia, and material in it must be verified by independent reliable sources. You should not submit unreferenced drafts. If you have substantial 3rd party independent published reliable sources, add them and resubmit. If not, wait until you do. In the meantime, you might like to learn how things aredone hereby adding sourced information--together with the references-- to existing articles. DGG ( talk ) 09:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC) "

I was thinking it is a free encyclopedia. Thanks for your service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zninja-rs (talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Robert Reffkin's Wikipedia Page
My name is Anna Feagan and I work for Compass, a real estate tech company. I'm posting here regarding Draft:Robert Reffkin. He is my CEO.

And I believe he is notable based on the following articles..

The page was deleted for astroturfing but Robert, myself, Compass have never hired or worked with this astroturfing service, Wikibaji. With that said, will I be blocked for re-submitting a page? And what can I do to clear Robert’s name in terms of being affiliated with this astroturfing thing? Annaelizabeth0711 (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Greetings. The Draft:Robert Reffkin was deleted as the creator, user:Wikibaji is a banned user. You could create Rober Reffkin page; however, it is highly not recommended as you have a conflict of interest here for you are a paid editor who woks for the subject. If you decide to create the article you need to create it in AfC for paid editor and the content adhere strictly with neutral point of view and non WP:PROMOTION tone/words included. You also need to disclosure your CIO and PAID in (1) your user page and (2) the draft article talk page. Pls read WP:COI, WP:PAID and see WP:DISCLOSURE the instruction on how to disclose. In addition, pls read WP:GOLDENRULE for requirements needed, and WP:Your First Article and referencing on how to write an article in Wikipedia and provide inline citations. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

18:04:18, 19 April 2019 review of submission by Mistertuft
I am unclear why this article was rejected. If the article was incorrectly entered or if wikipedia finds the article not noteworthy enough? The article is identifying a podcast about tennis with 30 episodes including guests who have been the #1 tennis players in the world and won all of the major tournaments. The show appears on all of the major podcast distribution sites (google, itunes, spotify, stitcher etc). please let me know either what i am doing wrong in inputting it or what i can do to make the show more relevant in the eyes of wikipedia. thank you so much.

Mistertuft (talk) 18:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * - hi there.


 * If you click on the blue words in the reject box it will explain things in much more detail, but I'll give the summary below.


 * Notability isn't a judgement of importance or even true relevance. It's a judgement on acceptable levels of secondary coverage (and occasionally other criteria) - sources must be "in-depth, independent, reliable, secondary". Neither of the two sources currently in the article would meet all of these criteria.


 * I'd advise the following:


 * Copy it back to your sandbox
 * Track down 3 sources (up to 6 is fine - don't "spam" the page) that cover it in-depth, preferably with at least 2 as reviews, that have no reason to be positive towards it
 * Add them in
 * Look at Article Wizard - don't just click through, read each page and think "does this apply to my work".
 * Only once you're confident, resubmit
 * Nosebagbear (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)