Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 27

= April 27 =

Request on 09:38:20, 27 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by SHISHIR DUA
To use my knowledge to the best and give a decent information an to update and create pages for your fabulous organization

SHISHIR DUA (talk) 09:38, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I think the editor accidentally added their message to the hidden text (I've uncovered it), but it doesn't actually explain what they want from us with respect to the draft. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The draft was blank so maybe that's what they meant, you have to add content.-- Booth Sift  03:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

15:12:12, 27 April 2019 review of draft by BCNJamez
What to do if the references are limited on the internet? Is there a minimum requirement for number of references?? The article i am creating is for a popular international supermodel. There are multiple articles on her.. But most as references wikipedia is not accepting.. I really cannot and am not able to find more "acceptable" references.. Please help me out

BCNJamez (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of their topic. The sources do not need to be on the internet. Sources for topics suitable for the encyclopedia can often be found in libraries. If you can't find sources which demonstrate that she is notable, then write about something else. The world will not come to an end if Wikipedia doesn't have an article about a particular popular international supermodel. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

18:57:17, 27 April 2019 review of draft by Telmo E Silva
I would like my article reviewed by someone else other than KylieTastic, taking into consideration similar articles that have been approved and published in the past.

ClicData is a company and I am its founder. I believe that ClicData has a place in Wikipedia, that it is a notable company and is no different than thousands of others companies and products currently published on Wikipedia.

Telmo Silva (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . The UserboxCOI declaration of your conflict of interest is misplaced. It belongs on your user page, not the draft page. There is a different template that goes on the talk page of the draft, but that has been taken care of for you.


 * I see that another reviewer has already obliged with a second evaluation of the draft. It is entirely possible that thousands of companies and products currently published on Wikipedia should not be. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or that it has been in any way "approved". It is not a good excuse to create similar articles. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. 123 articles have been deleted in the past 24 hours, and others have been redirected. I think that's a fairly typical day's work. You can help by not adding material that volunteers would have to delete. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

22:29:27, 27 April 2019 review of submission by Ajg2345
The Band MewithoutYou has released 2 albums called untitled - one is an ep called untitled that is lowercase and the other is a full length album that is Untitled with a capital letter. Both of this article and the one for the main LP are correct to the best of everyone's abilities please re-review this for clarity and content so that they can be added to the main MewithoutYou wikipedia page so people can find the proper information about the bands albums.

It is unclear to all involved why we keep getting the error messages that we get. Ajg2345 (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * - hi there. The error messages you are getting are because the reviewers think the EP doesn't have enough notability to warrant its own wikipedia article.


 * NALBUM (album notability) sets out how you can demonstrate its notability through one of several ways. By far the most common is 2 or more reviews of the EP/album, but the reviews must be independent, reliable and in-depth. SputnikMusic doesn't meet this set of requirements. There's a good list here of review websites accepted (or generally accepted) as meeting these requirements. Some are only legitimate if done by a staff writer, not a "contributor". Nosebagbear (talk) 23:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

I've added 3 more reviews for this e.p from reputable sites listed on the list you provided. Is this now enough information to approve the page for this album? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajg2345 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)