Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 5

= April 5 =

01:35:34, 5 April 2019 review of draft by Jgcolcord
Looking for an update on the status of my article. There are no copyright issues. Anything quoted is now public domain. I am still fairly new to all of this, so I apologize if is this is not the place to inquire. I just don’t want this article deleted without cause, and I’m not sure where to turn. Jgcolcord (talk) 01:35, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * good day. Reviewed and accepted. Pls note any copied prose should from public domain is still need be attributed. You could do a dummy edit and state in the edit summary and also stated in the article talk page. Pls see proper attribution pay for info and instructions. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

09:11:14, 5 April 2019 review of submission by Ernesto Dionisio, Jr.
Ernesto Dionisio, Jr. (talk) 09:11, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

09:14:08, 5 April 2019 review of draft by Egmputu2
My submission name "CSS CORP" has been pending from more than two months. Please let me know how long it will take to get reviewed?

Egmputu2 (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Declined by SamHolt6 on 6 April. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

10:08:52, 5 April 2019 review of draft by Marinkovukovojac
I would like to publish this page even though the detail is not yet complete. The detail comes from a detailed review of 1000s of images of Austrian army records and will take years to complete. However, I would like to provide interested persons with the details I have discovered so far. The page was removed to draft as I was told there were not enough citations. The nature of the page is that the detail, in the vast majority, is from Austrian Army records that were imaged by www.familysearch.org and available online although none has been transcribed. I have made improvements and hopeful the page now meets the citation requirements. Please advise. Thank you

Marinkovukovojac (talk) 10:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Good day. Articles in Wikipedia do not need to be a "completed" in order to merit a page in Wikipedia main space as long as the subject is notable and the content claimed could be verified by  multiple independent, reliable sources. To say that, your draft need to rework a bit for one the content need to be written in neurtral point of view, describe the content in a simple, direct, factual manner instead like "essay" style. Also pls provide inline citation on body text. Pls read WP:Your First Article and referencing to familiar yourself on how to write an article in Wikipedia and info and instructions on how to provide inline citation. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

12:09:37, 5 April 2019 review of submission by Chris7turner
Following further review and advice from @dodger67, removed all content except History section. Almost all sources referred to this section. Page now appears to be entirely factual and supported by a number of 3rd party, independent sources.

Chris7turner (talk) 12:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

13:17:30, 5 April 2019 review of submission by Hcs2019
Page has been updated with additional sources and citations to increase the notability of page. Hcs2019 (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

13:53:54, 5 April 2019 review of submission by Hcs2019
I have removed some of the direct links and added in additional sources - how would you suggest this page could be improved? Hcs2019 (talk) 13:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Question re-posted and answered on 8 April. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

16:02:36, 5 April 2019 review of submission by Another irate man
I made a lot of new changes to my article. I added more sources and made the number more notable, in contrast to the earlier revision that only had one fact about the number. I don't know what I was thinking, but I got the help of User:StaringAtTheStars, and he helped find articles with the number 91,000,000 in them, and I now have 19 references.

Another irate man (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . The topic is not notable. Continuing to push it may be seen as tendentious editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I respectfully disagree with you, Worldbruce, because I believe the number 91 million is an incredibly notable number, and it frequently pops up in numerous headlines, as listed in the article. I highly doubt you even looked at the article, as your response indicates through it's short length and unintelligent comparison to tendentious editing. I would highly recommend actually looking at my article and the changes that were made to it before you judge the notability of 91 million.
 * Another irate man (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The draft consists of random disconnected trivial facts about mentions of the number, nothing there suggests any notability. See this article 6000 (number) for an example of what is acceptable. Theroadislong (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

16:27:36, 5 April 2019 review of submission by Potatowrite
Hi, I'm hoping to get some additional feedback and help on this article. I've cited newspapers, magazines, and other materials to show the relevance of this particular company, but I'd love to know what types of information would be seen as helping the case to create this article.

Potatowrite (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Commented on draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

23:33:23, 5 April 2019 review of draft by Hansjeet
we do have allot of newspaper articles which covered his hockey events/career not his personal life. However these newspaper articles do not include the source or the date. If we do no have this information does that mean we cannot publish? Hansjeet (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Who is "we"?
 * 2) A valid citation is to a specific source. If you can't tell us what newspaper, what date, and what page, how can we check the reference? Random "clippings" which do not include this information cannot be verified, and thus cannot be used (especially in this era of Photoshop and other image-editing programs). -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  23:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)