Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 December 26

= December 26 =

05:00:39, 26 December 2019 review of submission by Sarasota6
I would like to ask for assistance in writing an article about Sari Greene. Sari Greene is an information security practitioner, author, and entrepreneur. In 2003, Sari founded one of the first dedicated cybersecurity consultancies. She is notable for this reason. I took her online class so I dont know if that is a conflict or not Sarasota6 (talk) 05:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC) Sarasota6 (talk) 05:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , If you can find reliable and independent sources that discuss her, she may be notable enough to have an article about her. Usually, at least three, and ideally more, sources are needed. Think coverage in newspapers, magazines, news sources. Her own websites and materials do not count. In terms of a conflict of interest, you are probably fine. If you wish to declare a COI, that would be fine, but I don't think you have to in this situation. Now if you know Greene personally, or have some other sort of relationship, or have been paid by her in anyway, then yes you would need to disclose. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Request on 09:13:12, 26 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Krishnachandra,india
Krishnachandra,india (talk) 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , This article needs inline citations, please see referencing for beginners. Also, since the film has yet to come out, this article may be premature. Please ensure you have enough reliable sources that cover the topic. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

13:28:01, 26 December 2019 review of submission by Mohsinmusta97
Mohsinmusta97 (talk) 13:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , for a musician to have an article here, they have to meet any one of the following criteria:
 * Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the musician, ensemble, composer, or lyricist, or their works.  (See the self-published sources policy for details about the reliability of such sources, and the conflict of interest policy for treatment of promotional, vanity material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the musician, ensemble, composer, or lyricist notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. The rationale for this is easy to see – someone simply talking about themselves in their own personal blog, website, book publisher, social networking site or music networking site, etc., does not automatically mean they have sufficient attention in the world at large to be notable. If that was so then everyone could have an article. Wikipedia is not a directory.
 * This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries. What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad except for the following:
 * Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising. For example, endorsement deal publicity (including sell sheets, promo posters, fliers, print advertising and links to an official company website) that lists the artist as an endorser or contains an "endorsement interview" with the artist.
 * Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.
 * Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.
 * Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
 * Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
 * Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.
 * Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).
 * Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.
 * Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
 * Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
 * Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.
 * Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.
 * Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
 * Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.
 * You haven't demonstrated the subject of your article meets any of these criteria, thus it has been declined. At this point, it seems unlikely the subject meets these criteria. Please read Too soon.  Oxon Alex    - talk  19:45, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a note that these criteria outline additional considerations for GNG, not that meeting any of them automatically makes the topic notable. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK  —Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a note that these criteria outline additional considerations for GNG, not that meeting any of them automatically makes the topic notable. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK  —Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

22:12:44, 26 December 2019 review of submission by Cgerdeskcts9
Hello, I work for Cascade Public Media, the PBS affiliate for the Seattle area. Cascade Public Media owns KCTS 9, the local PBS televisions station, and Crosscut, a Seattle public media news website. Both of these brands have Wikipedia pages and are a popular part of the Seattle community. We are trying to show the relationship between companies and, as a nonprofit, we are trying to be as transparent as possible with our donors with our naming and relationships, which is why we are working to create a Cascade Public Media Wikipedia page that better connects our brands. We want to make sure information about Cascade Public Media, Crosscut and KCTS 9 is easy to find online. I have had the Cascade Public Media page turned down multiple times, and have edited it several times in the process. I am hoping to get some insight on what we can to do to publish this page.

Thank you, Caroline

Cgerdeskcts9 (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hi Caroline! I would suggest merging the information that you have into KCTS-TV as previously mentioned. You can always make a new WP:SECTION on that page to help separate the information. Please let us know if you have any more questions. Happy Editing! Snowycats (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)