Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 December 4

= December 4 =

04:06:29, 4 December 2019 review of draft by Suhriyani tribe
Suhriyani tribe (talk) 04:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , This page already exists in the mainspace as List of Baloch tribes. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

04:49:09, 4 December 2019 review of draft by IJK193
I have cleaned up the article and I would like an extra hand to check it out. According to Wikipedia, it should be written from a natural point of view, I have addressed this. The article doesn't look promotional in content but written from the natural point of view but I still need an extra hand to check it out.

IJK193 (talk) 04:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , Perhaps you mean a neutral point of view? Regardless, I see the issue as one of notability, i.e. who gets to have an article. I'm not sure what this guy has done to warrant a Wikipedia article, he doesn't appear to meet the musician notability guidelines. Some more sources are needed. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * , He has no business with WP:NMUSIC cause his, not a musician. He appears to meet WP:ANYBIO and WP:NMODEL due to this contribution as an executive and talent manager.--IJK193 (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

05:12:49, 4 December 2019 review of submission by Sonu07091996
Sonu07091996 (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that this article will not be published. The company you are writing about does not seem to be notable. Sorry. I recommend you find another area of Wikipedia to edit, and hone your skills there! Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Can you guide me what should I do to publish the article, as I am unable to make it Out?
 * Publish it somewhere other than Wikipedia. See WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 6. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:15, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

06:59:25, 4 December 2019 review of submission by Ayushchandrakala
Ayushchandrakala (talk) 06:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , This seems to be an average person, which we do not cover. Wikipedia only has articles for notable people. That usually means that said person has received significant coverage in the media. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Request on 08:20:42, 4 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Priyanka8971
I need to know why my drafts, articles are being rejected by the wiki, as there are many pages, articles of individual companies and brands, so don't they do the marketing and promote themself over wiki? Example links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_4_Less

Priyanka8971 (talk) 08:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written by volunteers, not company representatives. They are not social media pages or profiles that represent a company directly (see WP:NOTPROMO). Such editors are WP:PAID editors with a conflict of interest. The company you are trying to promote here was founded this year and the article has zero reliable sources to prove notability. shoy (reactions) 15:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Also asked and answered at Teahouse and at Priyanka8971 Talk page. David notMD (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

08:48:42, 4 December 2019 review of draft by Devanshmrc
Devanshmrc (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

I am working on this draft past six months, striving hard to publish it. OTRS is also recieved. Please help to get it published.

09:41:12, 4 December 2019 review of submission by Andreabartoli
This is my very first article on Wikipedia. I think now I have understood what was the problem. Please allow me to resubmit the edited article. Many thanks.

Andreabartoli (talk) 09:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

11:48:54, 4 December 2019 review of submission by Jain13tushar
Hi there, Shubham Mishra is one of the youngest security leaders in India. He is associated with many governments like U.P police, CBI and training many officials in various sectors of cybersecurity. Do consider this article for creation.

Thank You Jain13tushar (talk) 11:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , Have considered. This person is not notable for inclusion, as he does not have enough independent coverage of him. We only write articles about a small number of people, and this dude does not meet our standards. I recommend you focus on another area of Wikipedia to edit, where you may hone your skills. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Request on 12:32:12, 4 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Pageturners
The Wikipedia entry for Cyclingworks Dublin has been rejected, on the basis that it's not notable enough for Wikipedia. Surely this isn't correct? Multinationals, universities, unions and firms representing over 400,000 people in a city with a population of 1.5 million have asked the Government to provide safe cycling infrastructure, in a drive that is continuing with new organisations joining - surely this is notable.

Pageturners (talk) 12:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * , please read WP:NORG which explains that we assess notability by to what extent other reliable, independent publications have already written in depth about the subject. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Replying to this (I'm Pageturners) - here are some links about the project. It hasn't had a lot of press coverage, but on the website of the project itself you can see the logos of the 101 companies and organisations that have so far written to the Irish Government seeking safe infrastructure for cyclists in Dublin. A little of the press coverage: The Irish Times last year: "Dublin businesses call for safe cycling infrastructure in the city" https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/dublin-businesses-call-for-safer-cycling-infrastructure-in-city-1.3550891 ; the newsletter of Fórsa, the second-largest union in the country, representing civil servants: " Fórsa backs cycle network plan" http://forsatradeunion.newsweaver.com/designtest/14fjh4llsk8?a=3&p=54228001&t=30058761 ; Orwell Wheelers, Dublin's largest cycling club (Cyclingworks Dublin was started shortly after one of the club's members was killed on a training run) "Cycling Works Dublin Initiative: https://www.orwellwheelers.org/forum/8-miscellaneous-club-chatter/6845-cycling-works-dublin-initiative ; Dublin Chamber of Commerce: "Dublin Firms Join Forces to Demand Better Cycling Infrastructure" https://www.dublinchamber.ie/media/news/july-2018/dublin-firms-join-forces-to-demand-better-cycling ; Trinity College Dublin (the country's oldest and most prestigious university, founded by the English queen Elizabeth I) "Trinity supports campaign for improved cycling infrastructure" http://trinitynews.ie/2018/05/trinity-supports-campaign-for-improved-cycling-infrastructure/

I hope this sample is enough. Pageturners (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . The size, popularity, or virtuousness of an organization is not what determines its suitabiliy for being a stand alone article in an encyclopedia. A good example of an article about an organization is Seacology. Contrast it and WP:WHYN with the reliable and independent information available about Cyclingworks Dublin. All that The Irish Times says about CyclingWorks, for example, is that Stephen McManus is its co-founder. Based on the sample you've provided, I concur with the other reviewers that the organization is not sufficiently notable for inclusion at this time. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

The only reason for seeking an entry is that Wikipedia is useful because journalists and others check it as a source. Pageturners (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

14:46:41, 4 December 2019 review of submission by MarcoLaudato
Hello :)

I have amended the article according to the reviewers' criticisms. In particular, I have added two secondary sources (from European Mathematical Society) and I have removed the Mission Statement section. Moreover, all the external links have been removed from the body of the article.

Please, let me know if something else needs to be done!

Kind regards, Marco MarcoLaudato (talk) 14:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , This institution does not appear to be notable. I.e. there are not enough sources that cover the subject with significant coverage. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

14:53:22, 4 December 2019 review of draft by Jtorpy
Jtorpy (talk) 14:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your feedback on the most recently submitted draft. I am wondering as to which statements (a couple examples would be helpful, not necessarily every case) qualify as "individual statement[s] of importance of judgment" to be removed might be? Much of the information in the article is most readily available via internal sources, but knowing which remaining aspects are problematic would help target the search for external sources


 * Hi . Avoid stating as facts things that are opinions (as to importance, as to why, and as to other matters of judgement). Furthermore, do not state opinions in Wikipedia's voice. Examples:
 * "Perhaps most importantly, ..."
 * "Due to the relative seclusion of Ann Arbor, ..."
 * "From this legislature grew a tradition ..."
 * "Hindsdale, like most of the early museum researchers, made important contributions ..."
 * "This contribution ... cemented his legacy as a pioneer in ethnobotany."
 * --Worldbruce (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

17:04:34, 4 December 2019 review of submission by Jordifernanjo
I'm studying a web develope course in english and we have been asked to post an article in wikipedia or other wiki sites. I have choose the this topic as it's a game im playing rigth now. I have base the article in the information of the developer page and some articles as well as my own experience. I have been asked to provide some links but as im using my own experience and developers information, I don't reallly know what to provide. Jordifernanjo (talk) 17:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles are based on independent reliable sources, we have no interest in what the developer says, or in what you or I know about the topic. So the draft cannot be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

17:40:57, 4 December 2019 review of draft by Josef Hoffman
How to create an article ?

Josef Hoffman (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , Howdy hello! You will need to submit the article for review through the Articles for Creation process. You can do that by clicking the blue submit box on your draft. But I recommend you don't do that yet, as your article is not yet sufficient. It has no sources, and will likely be failed promptly. You need at least 3 reliable and independent sources in the article. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

18:22:11, 4 December 2019 review of draft by Amgad Mohb Amin Lewaia
Amgad Mohb Amin Lewaia 18:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

1:1

مساحة الارقام = 1 + 1 = 2

طول ضلع الارقام = 1 ÷ 2 = 0.5

0.5 : 0.5

مساحة الارقام = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1

طول ضلع الارقام = 0.5 ÷ 1 = 0.5

طول ضلع الارقام للارقام المتشابهة يساوي النصف
 * This is just nonsense. Ask in English or we can't help you. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

18:54:34, 4 December 2019 review of draft by AleLagos77
I would like to have my article for creation reviewed again. I made the requested changes and I think now it is good to be published. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:George_Hammer_III

Best Regards,

AleLagos77 (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , See my comments on the draft. In essence, this article is still overly promotional, and I see no special reason why this dude should have an article, i.e. they do not meet any part of the biography notability guidelines. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

20:46:00, 4 December 2019 review of draft by Vickymarco01
I don't know how to make good references. Especially the little number that appears on a word and clicking on it you can directly go to the link or notes at the end of the page. Vickymarco01 (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , Please see referencing for beginners. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)